Reflections on representing incarcerated people with disabilities: Ableism in prison reform litigation

Jamelia N. Morgan*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Over the last five decades, advocates have fought for and secured constitutional prohibitions challenging solitary confinement, including ending the placement and prolonged isolation of individuals with psychiatric disabilities in solitary confinement. Yet, despite the valiant efforts of this courageous movement to protect the rights of incarcerated people with disabilities through litigation, the legal regime protecting these rights reflects a troubling paradigm: ableism. Ableism is a complex system of cultural, political, economic, and social practices that facilitate, construct, or reinforce the subordination of people with disabilities in a given society. In this Essay I argue that current Eighth Amendment jurisprudence in prison conditions of confinement cases in some ways requires lawyers to engage in ableism to protect their clients from harsh and inhumane treatment. The complexity of this arrangement-as between protecting and expanding the rights of people with disabilities and reinforcing practices that facilitate their exclusion and subordination-is both a cause and effect of ableism, particularly in the area of Eighth Amendment jurisprudence. Though entrenched in our legal institutions, the overrepresentation of people with disabilities in the criminal legal system calls for a new approach to the representation of these individuals. Toward that end, this Essay proposes a series of interventions in both law and professional practice to reduce the reliance on, and effect of, ableism in representing people with disabilities in the prison reform litigation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)973-991
Number of pages19
JournalDenver Law Review
Volume96
Issue number4
StatePublished - 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reflections on representing incarcerated people with disabilities: Ableism in prison reform litigation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this