Regrets of the typical american

Findings from a nationally representative sample

Mike Morrison*, Neal Roese

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

32 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this study of regret among a representative sample of Americans, the authors examined hypotheses derived from regret regulation theory, which asserts that regrets motivate a range of ameliorative cognitive consequences. Using a random-digit telephone survey, respondents reported a salient regret, then answered questions about that regret. Results showed inaction regrets lasted longer than action regrets, and that greater loss severity corresponded to more inaction regrets. Regrets more often focused on nonfixable than fixable situations. Women more than men reported love rather than work regrets and, overall, regrets more often focused on romance than on other life domains. Objective life circumstances (referenced by demographic variables) predicted regret in patterns consistent with regret regulation theory. These results complement laboratory findings while suggesting new refinements to existing theory.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)576-583
Number of pages8
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Volume2
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2011

Fingerprint

Emotions
Love
Telephone
Demography

Keywords

  • affect
  • inaction
  • judgment
  • opportunity
  • regret
  • regulation
  • representative sample

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

@article{1d5751dabf9e4260a3ceb416010339b6,
title = "Regrets of the typical american: Findings from a nationally representative sample",
abstract = "In this study of regret among a representative sample of Americans, the authors examined hypotheses derived from regret regulation theory, which asserts that regrets motivate a range of ameliorative cognitive consequences. Using a random-digit telephone survey, respondents reported a salient regret, then answered questions about that regret. Results showed inaction regrets lasted longer than action regrets, and that greater loss severity corresponded to more inaction regrets. Regrets more often focused on nonfixable than fixable situations. Women more than men reported love rather than work regrets and, overall, regrets more often focused on romance than on other life domains. Objective life circumstances (referenced by demographic variables) predicted regret in patterns consistent with regret regulation theory. These results complement laboratory findings while suggesting new refinements to existing theory.",
keywords = "affect, inaction, judgment, opportunity, regret, regulation, representative sample",
author = "Mike Morrison and Neal Roese",
year = "2011",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/1948550611401756",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "2",
pages = "576--583",
journal = "Social Psychological and Personality Science",
issn = "1948-5506",
publisher = "Sage Periodicals Press",
number = "6",

}

Regrets of the typical american : Findings from a nationally representative sample. / Morrison, Mike; Roese, Neal.

In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 2, No. 6, 01.11.2011, p. 576-583.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regrets of the typical american

T2 - Findings from a nationally representative sample

AU - Morrison, Mike

AU - Roese, Neal

PY - 2011/11/1

Y1 - 2011/11/1

N2 - In this study of regret among a representative sample of Americans, the authors examined hypotheses derived from regret regulation theory, which asserts that regrets motivate a range of ameliorative cognitive consequences. Using a random-digit telephone survey, respondents reported a salient regret, then answered questions about that regret. Results showed inaction regrets lasted longer than action regrets, and that greater loss severity corresponded to more inaction regrets. Regrets more often focused on nonfixable than fixable situations. Women more than men reported love rather than work regrets and, overall, regrets more often focused on romance than on other life domains. Objective life circumstances (referenced by demographic variables) predicted regret in patterns consistent with regret regulation theory. These results complement laboratory findings while suggesting new refinements to existing theory.

AB - In this study of regret among a representative sample of Americans, the authors examined hypotheses derived from regret regulation theory, which asserts that regrets motivate a range of ameliorative cognitive consequences. Using a random-digit telephone survey, respondents reported a salient regret, then answered questions about that regret. Results showed inaction regrets lasted longer than action regrets, and that greater loss severity corresponded to more inaction regrets. Regrets more often focused on nonfixable than fixable situations. Women more than men reported love rather than work regrets and, overall, regrets more often focused on romance than on other life domains. Objective life circumstances (referenced by demographic variables) predicted regret in patterns consistent with regret regulation theory. These results complement laboratory findings while suggesting new refinements to existing theory.

KW - affect

KW - inaction

KW - judgment

KW - opportunity

KW - regret

KW - regulation

KW - representative sample

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=83755225110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=83755225110&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/1948550611401756

DO - 10.1177/1948550611401756

M3 - Review article

VL - 2

SP - 576

EP - 583

JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science

JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science

SN - 1948-5506

IS - 6

ER -