Regulatory focus and temporal distance

Ginger L. Pennington*, Neal J. Roese

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

180 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Four studies identify and examine a temporal component to regulatory focus. Results support the assertion that promotion focus tends to predominate for temporally distant goals, whereas proximal goals are characterized by more balanced consideration of both promotion- and prevention-focused concerns. In Study 1, students rated the importance of promotion and prevention goals at two points in time: 2 weeks before and a few minutes before an examination. Promotion goal importance increased with temporal distance, whereas prevention goal importance remained constant over time. Study 2 replicated this pattern holding the actual time-span constant (3.5 weeks) and varying only the psychological sense of proximity/distance. In Study 3, subjects rated the regulatory focus of goals at varying points in time, both future and past. The temporal effect was replicated for both time periods. Study 4 provided evidence for the reverse effect, that of regulatory focus on the perceived temporal distance of future goals. Taken together, these findings suggest an integration across research domains that links regulatory focus to temporal perspective for both prospective and retrospective judgments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)563-576
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
Volume39
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2003

Fingerprint

promotion
time
examination
evidence
student
Students
Psychology
Research

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Social Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science

Cite this

@article{5968e815a35649d896435f3b8b1f93b2,
title = "Regulatory focus and temporal distance",
abstract = "Four studies identify and examine a temporal component to regulatory focus. Results support the assertion that promotion focus tends to predominate for temporally distant goals, whereas proximal goals are characterized by more balanced consideration of both promotion- and prevention-focused concerns. In Study 1, students rated the importance of promotion and prevention goals at two points in time: 2 weeks before and a few minutes before an examination. Promotion goal importance increased with temporal distance, whereas prevention goal importance remained constant over time. Study 2 replicated this pattern holding the actual time-span constant (3.5 weeks) and varying only the psychological sense of proximity/distance. In Study 3, subjects rated the regulatory focus of goals at varying points in time, both future and past. The temporal effect was replicated for both time periods. Study 4 provided evidence for the reverse effect, that of regulatory focus on the perceived temporal distance of future goals. Taken together, these findings suggest an integration across research domains that links regulatory focus to temporal perspective for both prospective and retrospective judgments.",
author = "Pennington, {Ginger L.} and Roese, {Neal J.}",
year = "2003",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00058-1",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "39",
pages = "563--576",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Social Psychology",
issn = "0022-1031",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Regulatory focus and temporal distance. / Pennington, Ginger L.; Roese, Neal J.

In: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 39, No. 6, 01.01.2003, p. 563-576.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Regulatory focus and temporal distance

AU - Pennington, Ginger L.

AU - Roese, Neal J.

PY - 2003/1/1

Y1 - 2003/1/1

N2 - Four studies identify and examine a temporal component to regulatory focus. Results support the assertion that promotion focus tends to predominate for temporally distant goals, whereas proximal goals are characterized by more balanced consideration of both promotion- and prevention-focused concerns. In Study 1, students rated the importance of promotion and prevention goals at two points in time: 2 weeks before and a few minutes before an examination. Promotion goal importance increased with temporal distance, whereas prevention goal importance remained constant over time. Study 2 replicated this pattern holding the actual time-span constant (3.5 weeks) and varying only the psychological sense of proximity/distance. In Study 3, subjects rated the regulatory focus of goals at varying points in time, both future and past. The temporal effect was replicated for both time periods. Study 4 provided evidence for the reverse effect, that of regulatory focus on the perceived temporal distance of future goals. Taken together, these findings suggest an integration across research domains that links regulatory focus to temporal perspective for both prospective and retrospective judgments.

AB - Four studies identify and examine a temporal component to regulatory focus. Results support the assertion that promotion focus tends to predominate for temporally distant goals, whereas proximal goals are characterized by more balanced consideration of both promotion- and prevention-focused concerns. In Study 1, students rated the importance of promotion and prevention goals at two points in time: 2 weeks before and a few minutes before an examination. Promotion goal importance increased with temporal distance, whereas prevention goal importance remained constant over time. Study 2 replicated this pattern holding the actual time-span constant (3.5 weeks) and varying only the psychological sense of proximity/distance. In Study 3, subjects rated the regulatory focus of goals at varying points in time, both future and past. The temporal effect was replicated for both time periods. Study 4 provided evidence for the reverse effect, that of regulatory focus on the perceived temporal distance of future goals. Taken together, these findings suggest an integration across research domains that links regulatory focus to temporal perspective for both prospective and retrospective judgments.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0242402209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0242402209&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00058-1

DO - 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00058-1

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0242402209

VL - 39

SP - 563

EP - 576

JO - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

SN - 0022-1031

IS - 6

ER -