TY - JOUR
T1 - Rehabilitation Consumers' Use and Understanding of Quality Information
T2 - A Health Literacy Perspective
AU - Magasi, Susan
AU - Durkin, Elizabeth
AU - Wolf, Michael S.
AU - Deutsch, Anne
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research through a Rehabilitation Research and Training Center on Measuring Rehabilitation Outcomes and Effectiveness (grant no. H133B040032).
PY - 2009/2
Y1 - 2009/2
N2 - Magasi S, Durkin E, Wolf MS, Deutsch A. Rehabilitation consumers' use and understanding of quality information: a health literacy perspective. Objectives: To explore consumers' use and understanding of quality information about postacute rehabilitation facilities. Design: Thematic, semistructured interviews. Setting: Two skilled nursing facilities and 2 inpatient rehabilitation facilities in a large Midwestern city. Participants: Rehabilitation inpatients (n=17) with stroke, hip fractures, and joint replacements and care partners (n=12) of rehabilitation inpatients. Intervention: None. Main Outcome Measure: None. Results: Health literacy imposed barriers to participants' understanding of quality information. Using the Institute of Medicine's Health Literacy Framework, we identified specific barriers that limited participants' abilities to (1) obtain quality information, (2) process and understand quality information, and (3) make appropriate decisions about the quality of a rehabilitation facility. Participants tended to rely on informal and nonquality information when choosing a rehabilitation facility. Conclusions: Given the barriers imposed by low health literacy, rehabilitation providers have a responsibility to present quality information in a way that consumers, especially those with low health literacy, can use and understand.
AB - Magasi S, Durkin E, Wolf MS, Deutsch A. Rehabilitation consumers' use and understanding of quality information: a health literacy perspective. Objectives: To explore consumers' use and understanding of quality information about postacute rehabilitation facilities. Design: Thematic, semistructured interviews. Setting: Two skilled nursing facilities and 2 inpatient rehabilitation facilities in a large Midwestern city. Participants: Rehabilitation inpatients (n=17) with stroke, hip fractures, and joint replacements and care partners (n=12) of rehabilitation inpatients. Intervention: None. Main Outcome Measure: None. Results: Health literacy imposed barriers to participants' understanding of quality information. Using the Institute of Medicine's Health Literacy Framework, we identified specific barriers that limited participants' abilities to (1) obtain quality information, (2) process and understand quality information, and (3) make appropriate decisions about the quality of a rehabilitation facility. Participants tended to rely on informal and nonquality information when choosing a rehabilitation facility. Conclusions: Given the barriers imposed by low health literacy, rehabilitation providers have a responsibility to present quality information in a way that consumers, especially those with low health literacy, can use and understand.
KW - Qualitative research
KW - Quality indicators, health care
KW - Rehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=60349102480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=60349102480&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.023
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2008.07.023
M3 - Article
C2 - 19236975
AN - SCOPUS:60349102480
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 90
SP - 206
EP - 212
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 2
ER -