TY - JOUR
T1 - REI clinics and fellowship training—a national snapshot to improve access to reproductive care
AU - Diego, Daniela
AU - Shandley, Lisa M.
AU - Feinberg, Eve C.
AU - Cedars, Marcelle I.
AU - Adashi, Eli Y.
AU - Kawwass, Jennifer F.
AU - Hipp, Heather S.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/9
Y1 - 2023/9
N2 - Purpose: To analyze the geographic distribution of REI fellowships and clinics across the USA and to strategize ways to improve patient access to care. Methods: Cross-sectional study using population data obtained from publicly available United States Census Bureau, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART), and National Resident Matching Program websites. Outcomes include the number of REI clinics, REI fellowship-trained physicians, and REI fellowship programs. Results: In 2020, there were 643 assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics reporting to SART and 1351 fellowship-trained REI physicians. Most clinics are located in the south (n = 209); however, the northeast has the highest density of REI clinics. Out of 301,316 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the USA in 2020, northeastern states initiated the most cycles (n = 93,565), and Midwestern states initiated the fewest cycles (n = 50,000). The northeast has the most REI physicians per million women aged 20–44 years (42.4) while the Midwest has the lowest ratio (19.5). There are fewer REI physicians per million women aged 20–44 years in states with a lower proportion of patients with health insurance (r = 0.56, 95% confidence interval ([CI] 0.34–0.73) and in states with a lower average income per resident (r = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46–0.79). Most of the 49 accredited REI fellowship programs in the USA are in the northeast (n = 18), and there are fewest in the south (n = 10) and west (n = 10). Conclusion: Access to REI care has large geographic disparities from a clinic, physician, and training program perspective. Creative solutions are needed to remedy this problem.
AB - Purpose: To analyze the geographic distribution of REI fellowships and clinics across the USA and to strategize ways to improve patient access to care. Methods: Cross-sectional study using population data obtained from publicly available United States Census Bureau, Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART), and National Resident Matching Program websites. Outcomes include the number of REI clinics, REI fellowship-trained physicians, and REI fellowship programs. Results: In 2020, there were 643 assisted reproductive technology (ART) clinics reporting to SART and 1351 fellowship-trained REI physicians. Most clinics are located in the south (n = 209); however, the northeast has the highest density of REI clinics. Out of 301,316 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles in the USA in 2020, northeastern states initiated the most cycles (n = 93,565), and Midwestern states initiated the fewest cycles (n = 50,000). The northeast has the most REI physicians per million women aged 20–44 years (42.4) while the Midwest has the lowest ratio (19.5). There are fewer REI physicians per million women aged 20–44 years in states with a lower proportion of patients with health insurance (r = 0.56, 95% confidence interval ([CI] 0.34–0.73) and in states with a lower average income per resident (r = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46–0.79). Most of the 49 accredited REI fellowship programs in the USA are in the northeast (n = 18), and there are fewest in the south (n = 10) and west (n = 10). Conclusion: Access to REI care has large geographic disparities from a clinic, physician, and training program perspective. Creative solutions are needed to remedy this problem.
KW - Access to care
KW - Clinics
KW - Fellowship training
KW - Infertility
KW - Reproductive endocrinology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85163413008&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85163413008&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s10815-023-02868-y
DO - 10.1007/s10815-023-02868-y
M3 - Article
C2 - 37369889
AN - SCOPUS:85163413008
SN - 1058-0468
VL - 40
SP - 2101
EP - 2108
JO - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
JF - Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
IS - 9
ER -