TY - JOUR
T1 - Reimbursement for Female-Specific Compared with Male-Specific Procedures over Time
AU - Polan, Rosa M.
AU - Barber, Emma L.
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr. Barber is supported by NICHD K12 HD050121-12, the NIA (P30AG059988-01A1) and the GOG Foundation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/12/1
Y1 - 2021/12/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE:To evaluate whether per-procedure work relative value units (RVUs) have changed over time and to compare time-based compensation for female-specific procedures compared with male-specific procedures.METHODS:Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program files for 2015-2018, we compared operative time and RVUs for 12 pairs of sex-specific procedures. Procedures were matched to be anatomically and technically similar. Procedure-assigned RVUs in 2015 were compared with 1997. Procedure compensation was determined using median dollars per RVU provided in SullivanCotter's 2018 Physician Compensation and Productivity Survey. This was compared with specialty-specific McGraw-Hill per-RVU data from 1994. Statistical analysis was performed with chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests.RESULTS:A total of 12,120 patients underwent 6,217 male-specific procedures and 5,903 female-specific procedures. Male-specific procedures had a median (interquartile range) RVU of 25.2 (21.4-25.2), compared with 7.5 (7.5-23.4) for female-specific procedures (P<.001). Male-specific procedures were 79 minutes longer (median [interquartile range] 136 minutes [98-186] vs 57 minutes [25-125], P<.001). Female-specific procedures were reimbursed at a higher hourly rate (10.6 RVU/hour [7.2-16.2] vs 9.7 RVU/hour [7.4-12.8], P<.001). However, male-specific procedures were better reimbursed ($599/h [$457-790] vs $555/h [$377-843], P<.001). Overall, per-procedure RVUs for male-specific surgeries have increased 13%, whereas, for female-specific surgeries, per-procedure RVUs have increased 26%. Reimbursement per RVU for male-specific procedures has decreased 8% ($67.30 to $61.65), whereas for female-specific procedures it has increased 14% ($44.50 to $52.02).CONCLUSION:Increases in RVUs and specialty-specific compensation have resulted in more equitable reimbursement for female-specific procedures. However, even with these changes, there is a lower relative value of work, driven by specialty-specific compensation rates, for procedures performed for women-only compared with equivalent men-only procedures.
AB - OBJECTIVE:To evaluate whether per-procedure work relative value units (RVUs) have changed over time and to compare time-based compensation for female-specific procedures compared with male-specific procedures.METHODS:Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program files for 2015-2018, we compared operative time and RVUs for 12 pairs of sex-specific procedures. Procedures were matched to be anatomically and technically similar. Procedure-assigned RVUs in 2015 were compared with 1997. Procedure compensation was determined using median dollars per RVU provided in SullivanCotter's 2018 Physician Compensation and Productivity Survey. This was compared with specialty-specific McGraw-Hill per-RVU data from 1994. Statistical analysis was performed with chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests.RESULTS:A total of 12,120 patients underwent 6,217 male-specific procedures and 5,903 female-specific procedures. Male-specific procedures had a median (interquartile range) RVU of 25.2 (21.4-25.2), compared with 7.5 (7.5-23.4) for female-specific procedures (P<.001). Male-specific procedures were 79 minutes longer (median [interquartile range] 136 minutes [98-186] vs 57 minutes [25-125], P<.001). Female-specific procedures were reimbursed at a higher hourly rate (10.6 RVU/hour [7.2-16.2] vs 9.7 RVU/hour [7.4-12.8], P<.001). However, male-specific procedures were better reimbursed ($599/h [$457-790] vs $555/h [$377-843], P<.001). Overall, per-procedure RVUs for male-specific surgeries have increased 13%, whereas, for female-specific surgeries, per-procedure RVUs have increased 26%. Reimbursement per RVU for male-specific procedures has decreased 8% ($67.30 to $61.65), whereas for female-specific procedures it has increased 14% ($44.50 to $52.02).CONCLUSION:Increases in RVUs and specialty-specific compensation have resulted in more equitable reimbursement for female-specific procedures. However, even with these changes, there is a lower relative value of work, driven by specialty-specific compensation rates, for procedures performed for women-only compared with equivalent men-only procedures.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122047232&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85122047232&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004599
DO - 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004599
M3 - Article
C2 - 34736273
AN - SCOPUS:85122047232
SN - 0029-7844
VL - 138
SP - 878
EP - 883
JO - Obstetrics and gynecology
JF - Obstetrics and gynecology
IS - 6
ER -