Reliability of a preventability model in maternal death and morbidity

Stacie E. Geller*, Marci G. Adams, Michelle A. Kominiarek, Judith U. Hibbard, Loraine K. Endres, Suzanne M. Cox, Sarah J. Kilpatrick

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

39 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to measure the reliability of a model that defines preventability in maternal morbidity and death. Study design: One hundred cases of serious morbidity and death among peripartum women were reviewed by 2 independent groups of medical experts to identify potentially preventable provider or system events that may have led to the progression of illness. Results: Seventy-seven percent of the cases had concordant findings in both groups regarding the identification of any preventable events. Interrater agreement, which was measured by Cohen's Kappa, was 0.49, which suggests moderate to good reliability. Cases with multiple comorbidities, poor documentation, or preventable patient factors tended to have higher levels of disagreement. Conclusion: There was high agreement between the 2 groups regarding the identification of preventable events that impact maternal morbidity and death. The reliability of this model for the assessment of preventability is an important step for improvement in obstetric and medical care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)57.e1-57.e6
JournalAmerican journal of obstetrics and gynecology
Volume196
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2007

Keywords

  • maternal death
  • maternal morbidity
  • preventability

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability of a preventability model in maternal death and morbidity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Geller, S. E., Adams, M. G., Kominiarek, M. A., Hibbard, J. U., Endres, L. K., Cox, S. M., & Kilpatrick, S. J. (2007). Reliability of a preventability model in maternal death and morbidity. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 196(1), 57.e1-57.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.07.052