TY - JOUR
T1 - Reliability of anergy skin testing in persons with HIV infection
AU - Chin, Daniel P.
AU - Osmond, Dennis
AU - Page-Shafer, Kim
AU - Glassroth, Jeffrey
AU - Rosen, Mark J.
AU - Reichman, Lee B.
AU - Kvale, Paul A.
AU - Wallace, Jeanne M.
AU - Poole, W. Kenneth
AU - Hopewell, Philip C.
AU - Stansel, John
AU - Turner, Joan
AU - LeMaire, Barbara
AU - Richer, Barbara
AU - Au, Janet
AU - Coulson, Anne
AU - Clemente, Virgilio
AU - Shapiro, Bert
AU - Markowitz, Norman
AU - Saravolatz, Louis D.
AU - Johnson, Christine
AU - Huisting, Joanne
AU - Krystoforski, Annmarie
AU - Mossar, Melinda
AU - Hirschtick, Robert
AU - Mangura, Bonita T.
AU - Barnes, Saundra
AU - Meilselman, Lori
AU - Manghisi, Kim K.
AU - Scheider, Roselyn F.
AU - Cardoso, Christopher
AU - Kalb, Thomas H.
PY - 1996
Y1 - 1996
N2 - Testing with antigens that elicit delayed-type cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions is commonly used to evaluate immune competence in persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus; however, the reliability of such testing has not been determined. We performed serial testing with tuberculin, mumps, and Candida antigens in 491 HIV-infected persons and found that 30% of persons who initially had no reaction (0 mm) to any of the three antigens, and, thus, were considered to be anergic, had reaction to the mumps or Candida antigen when they were retested 12 months later. We also examined the results of mumps antigen tests in 50 subjects who had a negative tuberculin tests after an initial positive test. The mumps antigen test was positive in 39% of the subjects when the tuberculin test was falsely negative. We conclude that tests commonly used to define anergy cannot reliably identify the anergic state. Moreover, using the mumps antigen to aid in the interpretation of the tuberculin test will often lead to erroneous conclusions. These data indicate that the results of energy testing should not be used to make individual patient decisions concerning preventive therapy for tuberculosis.
AB - Testing with antigens that elicit delayed-type cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions is commonly used to evaluate immune competence in persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus; however, the reliability of such testing has not been determined. We performed serial testing with tuberculin, mumps, and Candida antigens in 491 HIV-infected persons and found that 30% of persons who initially had no reaction (0 mm) to any of the three antigens, and, thus, were considered to be anergic, had reaction to the mumps or Candida antigen when they were retested 12 months later. We also examined the results of mumps antigen tests in 50 subjects who had a negative tuberculin tests after an initial positive test. The mumps antigen test was positive in 39% of the subjects when the tuberculin test was falsely negative. We conclude that tests commonly used to define anergy cannot reliably identify the anergic state. Moreover, using the mumps antigen to aid in the interpretation of the tuberculin test will often lead to erroneous conclusions. These data indicate that the results of energy testing should not be used to make individual patient decisions concerning preventive therapy for tuberculosis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=8944221187&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=8944221187&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1164/ajrccm.153.6.8665065
DO - 10.1164/ajrccm.153.6.8665065
M3 - Article
C2 - 8665065
AN - SCOPUS:8944221187
SN - 1073-449X
VL - 153
SP - 1982
EP - 1984
JO - American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
JF - American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine
IS - 6 I
ER -