TY - JOUR
T1 - Reliability of the physical medicine and rehabilitation resident observation and competency assessment tool
T2 - A multi-institution study
AU - Musick, David W.
AU - Bockenek, William L.
AU - Massagli, Teresa L.
AU - Miknevich, Mary A.
AU - Poduri, K. Rao
AU - Sliwa, James A.
AU - Steiner, Monica
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - ObjectiveS: To assess the psychometric qualities of a method of resident physician evaluation by faculty. Design: Multicenter study by seven Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation training programs. Faculty physicians observed residents in brief patient encounters or teaching sessions, rated specific competencies, and provided residents with immediate feedback. The resident observation and competency assessment form included competencies in patient care, professionalism, interpersonal and communication skills, systems-based practice, and practice-based learning and improvement. Residents and faculty rated satisfaction with the process. Results: Three hundred sixty-two ratings were completed on 88 different residents. Each resident received an average of 3.8 ratings across two academic years. Overall internal consistency reliability was high (0.98); reliability of the individual competencies ranged from 0.74 to 0.76. Item means were correlated with year of training for two skill sets, with higher means for more experienced residents. The majority of participants gave high ratings of satisfaction; correlation between satisfaction ratings of attending and resident physicians was 0.63 (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The resident observation and competency assessment is a reliable method to assess resident skills in five of six general competencies. Construct validity of the tool is supported by the fact that faculty rated two skill sets higher for senior residents.
AB - ObjectiveS: To assess the psychometric qualities of a method of resident physician evaluation by faculty. Design: Multicenter study by seven Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation training programs. Faculty physicians observed residents in brief patient encounters or teaching sessions, rated specific competencies, and provided residents with immediate feedback. The resident observation and competency assessment form included competencies in patient care, professionalism, interpersonal and communication skills, systems-based practice, and practice-based learning and improvement. Residents and faculty rated satisfaction with the process. Results: Three hundred sixty-two ratings were completed on 88 different residents. Each resident received an average of 3.8 ratings across two academic years. Overall internal consistency reliability was high (0.98); reliability of the individual competencies ranged from 0.74 to 0.76. Item means were correlated with year of training for two skill sets, with higher means for more experienced residents. The majority of participants gave high ratings of satisfaction; correlation between satisfaction ratings of attending and resident physicians was 0.63 (P < 0.01). Conclusions: The resident observation and competency assessment is a reliable method to assess resident skills in five of six general competencies. Construct validity of the tool is supported by the fact that faculty rated two skill sets higher for senior residents.
KW - Clinical Skills Teaching
KW - Competency Assessment
KW - Resident Education
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77649162832&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77649162832&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181cf1b30
DO - 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181cf1b30
M3 - Article
C2 - 20173427
AN - SCOPUS:77649162832
SN - 0894-9115
VL - 89
SP - 235
EP - 244
JO - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 3
ER -