Remembering, understanding, and representation

Andrew Ortony*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Starting with the facts that not everything that is understood is remembered, and that not everything that is remembered is understood, this paper urges that models of language processing should be able to make a distinction between comprehension and memory. To this end, a case is made for a spreading activation process as being the essential ingredient of the comprehension process. It is argued that concepts activated during comprehension not only restrict the search set for candidate concepts to be used in a top-down fashion, they also constitute part of an episodic representation that can come to be part of long-term memory. The way in which these representations atrophy is discussed, as is the way in which their idiosyncratic components are eliminated in producing representations in semantic memory. Some observations on the comprehension and memory of text are made and arguments are presented to show how intrusions and omissions in recall can be handled. Some existing experimental data is reanalized in terms of the proposed model and alternative interpretations consistent with the model are shown to be possible.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)53-69
Number of pages17
JournalCognitive Science
Volume2
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1978

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Artificial Intelligence

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Remembering, understanding, and representation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this