Remittances and the Destination State: A Comparison of Bangladeshi Migrants in Japan and the USA

Hasan Mahmud*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Based on an ethnographic study of Bangladeshi migrants in Tokyo and Los Angeles, this chapter explores the role of the destination state in shaping remittances. It finds that the temporary character of the migration and family separation of migrants in Japan causes them to remit a greater portion of their income, whereas permanent settlement with the family and integration in the USA reduces remittances to just one-third of their income. This chapter explains these differences in terms of the destination state’s policies and practices toward the immigrants: whereas Japan allows migrant workers without offering permanent settlement, the USA invites Bangladeshi migrants to enter and permanently settle with their families and close relatives. By recognizing the destination state’s role in shaping remittances, this chapter expands our understanding of the remittances decay hypothesis and its implications for the migration-development nexus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationRemittances as Social Practices and Agents of Change
Subtitle of host publicationThe Future of Transnational Society
PublisherSpringer International Publishing AG
Pages179-201
Number of pages23
ISBN (Electronic)9783030815042
ISBN (Print)9783030815035
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2023

Keywords

  • Destination state
  • Migration and development
  • Permanent settlement
  • Remittances decay
  • Short CV
  • Transnationalism

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Social Sciences
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Remittances and the Destination State: A Comparison of Bangladeshi Migrants in Japan and the USA'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this