Renegotiation design: Evidence from National Football League roster bonuses

Gregor Matvos*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations


I exploit unique data on National Football League (NFL) players’ contracts to show how contractual arrangements in the NFL shape renegotiation and through that channel significantly affect players’ compensation and allocations. I show that a change in the timing of payments through the use of roster bonuses leads to contractual renegotiation and termination earlier in the off-season. This change in renegotiation incentives has quantitatively important consequences for players’ compensation and allocations. Players are willing to forgo approx- imately $260,000 for a contract with modified renegotiation incentives. More- over, players who are terminated earlier sign more valuable subsequent contracts and rematch with other teams more frequently. These predictions are consistent with a model in which players in the NFL are subject to contractual holdup. Designing renegotiation incentives through an altered timing of payments—the roster bonus—ameliorates this problem, which substantially increases ex post transfers of players and changes player allocations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)387-430
Number of pages44
JournalJournal of Law and Economics
Issue number2
StatePublished - May 1 2014

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Renegotiation design: Evidence from National Football League roster bonuses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this