TY - JOUR
T1 - REPLACE-BG
T2 - A randomized trial comparing continuous glucose monitoring with and without routine blood glucose monitoring in adults with well-controlled type 1 diabetes
AU - REPLACE-BG Study Group
AU - Aleppo, Grazia
AU - Ruedy, Katrina J.
AU - Riddlesworth, Tonya D.
AU - Kruger, Davida F.
AU - Peters, Anne L.
AU - Hirsch, Irl
AU - Bergenstal, Richard M.
AU - Toschi, Elena
AU - Ahmann, Andrew J.
AU - Shah, Viral N.
AU - Rickels, Michael R.
AU - Bode, Bruce W.
AU - Philis-Tsimikas, Athena
AU - Pop-Busui, Rodica
AU - Rodriguez, Henry
AU - Eyth, Emily
AU - Bhargava, Anuj
AU - Kollman, Craig
AU - Beck, Roy W.
AU - Cushman, Terra
AU - Harmel, Mark
AU - Khakpour, Dori
AU - Olson, Beth
AU - Massaro, Elaine
AU - Pollack, Teresa
AU - Atakov-Castillo, Astrid
AU - Jahnke, Kristin
AU - Thompson, Terra
AU - Peleckis, Amy
AU - O'Brien, Shannon
AU - Dalton-Bakes, Cornelia
AU - Tyler, Siana
AU - Rosal, Rosario
AU - Plunkett, Cynthia
AU - Borg, Lisa
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 by the American Diabetes Association.
PY - 2017/4/1
Y1 - 2017/4/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE To determine whether the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) without confirmatory blood glucose monitoring (BGM) measurements is as safe and effective as using CGM adjunctive to BGM in adults with well-controlled type 1 diabetes (T1D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A randomized noninferiority clinical trial was conducted at 14 sites in the T1D Exchange Clinic Network. Participants were ≥18 years of age (mean 44 6 14 years), had T1D for ≥1 year (mean duration 24 6 12 years), used an insulin pump, and had an HbA1c ≤9.0% (≤75 mmol/mL) (mean 7.0 ± 0.7% [53 6 7.7 mmol/mol]); prestudy, 47% were CGM users. Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to the CGM-only (n = 149) or CGM+BGM (n = 77) group. The primary outcome was time in range (70-180 mg/dL) over the 26-week trial, with a prespecified noninferiority limit of 7.5%. RESULTS CGMuse averaged 6.7±0.5 and 6.8±0.4 days/week in the CGM-only andCGM+BGM groups, respectively, over the 26-week trial. BGM tests per day (including the two required daily for CGM calibration) averaged 2.8 ± 0.9 and 5.4 ± 1.4 in the two groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Mean time in 70-180 mg/dL was 63613% at both baseline and 26 weeks in the CGM-only group and 65 ± 13% and 65 ± 11% in the CGM+BGM group (adjusted difference 0%; one-sided 95% CI 22%). No severe hypoglycemic events occurred in the CGM-only group, and one occurred in the CGM+BGM group. CONCLUSIONS Use of CGM without regular use of confirmatory BGM is as safe and effective as using CGM with BGM in adults with well-controlled T1D at low risk for severe hypoglycemia.
AB - OBJECTIVE To determine whether the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) without confirmatory blood glucose monitoring (BGM) measurements is as safe and effective as using CGM adjunctive to BGM in adults with well-controlled type 1 diabetes (T1D). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS A randomized noninferiority clinical trial was conducted at 14 sites in the T1D Exchange Clinic Network. Participants were ≥18 years of age (mean 44 6 14 years), had T1D for ≥1 year (mean duration 24 6 12 years), used an insulin pump, and had an HbA1c ≤9.0% (≤75 mmol/mL) (mean 7.0 ± 0.7% [53 6 7.7 mmol/mol]); prestudy, 47% were CGM users. Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to the CGM-only (n = 149) or CGM+BGM (n = 77) group. The primary outcome was time in range (70-180 mg/dL) over the 26-week trial, with a prespecified noninferiority limit of 7.5%. RESULTS CGMuse averaged 6.7±0.5 and 6.8±0.4 days/week in the CGM-only andCGM+BGM groups, respectively, over the 26-week trial. BGM tests per day (including the two required daily for CGM calibration) averaged 2.8 ± 0.9 and 5.4 ± 1.4 in the two groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Mean time in 70-180 mg/dL was 63613% at both baseline and 26 weeks in the CGM-only group and 65 ± 13% and 65 ± 11% in the CGM+BGM group (adjusted difference 0%; one-sided 95% CI 22%). No severe hypoglycemic events occurred in the CGM-only group, and one occurred in the CGM+BGM group. CONCLUSIONS Use of CGM without regular use of confirmatory BGM is as safe and effective as using CGM with BGM in adults with well-controlled T1D at low risk for severe hypoglycemia.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019613653&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019613653&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2337/dc16-2482
DO - 10.2337/dc16-2482
M3 - Article
C2 - 28209654
AN - SCOPUS:85019613653
SN - 1935-5548
VL - 40
SP - 538
EP - 545
JO - Diabetes Care
JF - Diabetes Care
IS - 4
ER -