Reply to Comments on the material frame-indifference controversy

Gregory Ryskin*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

In my recent Brief Report [Phys. Rev. A 32, 1239 (1985)] it was pointed out that the widespread confusion over the nature of material frame-indifference (MFI) is due to the attempts to justify this useful approximation by an appeal to the correct, but irrelevant, idea of material behavior being independent of the motion of an observer. The Comment by C. G. Speziale does not address this point, but concentrates instead on discussing how good an approximation the MFI is. This discussion is criticized below.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Number of pages1
JournalPhysical Review A
Volume36
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1987

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Physics and Astronomy(all)
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to Comments on the material frame-indifference controversy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this