Reply to Elementary integral of Bessel functions

E. Badralexe; A. J. Freeman

doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3244

Reply to Elementary integral of Bessel functions

E. Badralexe^*, A. J. Freeman

^*Corresponding author for this work

Physics and Astronomy

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The previous Comment neglects an existence condition for convergence of the integral in question which was previously demonstrated Weber, Schafheitlin, Dixon, and Ferrar, and detailed by Watson. The reason for this is traced to the fact that the result quoted in the Comment relies on a misprint of this condition in the integral table quoted. The true integral is nonconvergent and the previous conclusions of Brown and Ciftan are incorrect.

Original language	English (US)
Number of pages	1
Journal	Physical Review B
Volume	41
Issue number	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3244
State	Published - Jan 1 1990

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials
Condensed Matter Physics

Access to Document

10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3244

Cite this

@article{62b37a706ac54b5bb70c1046021d5180,

title = "Reply to Elementary integral of Bessel functions",

abstract = "The previous Comment neglects an existence condition for convergence of the integral in question which was previously demonstrated Weber, Schafheitlin, Dixon, and Ferrar, and detailed by Watson. The reason for this is traced to the fact that the result quoted in the Comment relies on a misprint of this condition in the integral table quoted. The true integral is nonconvergent and the previous conclusions of Brown and Ciftan are incorrect.",

author = "E. Badralexe and Freeman, {A. J.}",

year = "1990",

month = jan,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3244",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "41",

journal = "Physical Review B",

issn = "0163-1829",

publisher = "American Institute of Physics",

number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Elementary integral of Bessel functions

AU - Badralexe, E.

AU - Freeman, A. J.

PY - 1990/1/1

Y1 - 1990/1/1

N2 - The previous Comment neglects an existence condition for convergence of the integral in question which was previously demonstrated Weber, Schafheitlin, Dixon, and Ferrar, and detailed by Watson. The reason for this is traced to the fact that the result quoted in the Comment relies on a misprint of this condition in the integral table quoted. The true integral is nonconvergent and the previous conclusions of Brown and Ciftan are incorrect.

AB - The previous Comment neglects an existence condition for convergence of the integral in question which was previously demonstrated Weber, Schafheitlin, Dixon, and Ferrar, and detailed by Watson. The reason for this is traced to the fact that the result quoted in the Comment relies on a misprint of this condition in the integral table quoted. The true integral is nonconvergent and the previous conclusions of Brown and Ciftan are incorrect.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35949012691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35949012691&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3244

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevB.41.3244

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:35949012691

SN - 0163-1829

VL - 41

JO - Physical Review B

JF - Physical Review B

IS - 5

ER -

Reply to Elementary integral of Bessel functions

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this