Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process

Geoffrey Stewart Morrison*, Cedric Neumann, Patrick Henry Geoghegan, Gary Edmond, Tim Grant, R. Brent Ostrum, Paul Roberts, Michael Saks, Denise Syndercombe Court, William C. Thompson, Sandy Zabell

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Abstract

This Letter to the Editor is a reply to Mohammed et al. (2021) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2021.100145, which in turn is a response to Morrison et al. (2020) “Vacuous standards – subversion of the OSAC standards-development process” https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.06.005.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number100149
JournalForensic Science International: Synergy
Volume3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2021

Keywords

  • Forensic science
  • Method validation
  • Quality management
  • Standard
  • Validation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to Response to Vacuous standards – Subversion of the OSAC standards-development process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this