Reply to Rusch, Jungwirth, and Hilsdorf's second discussion of the paper "on the choice of creep function for standard recommendations on practical analysis of structures"

Zdeněk P. Bažant*, El Mamoun Osman

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

It is rather unusual to receive a discussion of authors' reply, and it is very welcomed as an indication of the interest in this topic and its importance. Since the second discussion makes it clear that some of the questions still persist, the authors are pleased to provide clarification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-130
Number of pages12
JournalCement and Concrete Research
Volume7
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1977

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Building and Construction
  • Materials Science(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to Rusch, Jungwirth, and Hilsdorf's second discussion of the paper "on the choice of creep function for standard recommendations on practical analysis of structures"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this