Reply to Rusch, Jungwirth, and Hilsdorf's second discussion of the paper "on the choice of creep function for standard recommendations on practical analysis of structures"

Zdeněk P. Bažant; El Mamoun Osman

doi:10.1016/0008-8846(77)90020-5

Reply to Rusch, Jungwirth, and Hilsdorf's second discussion of the paper "on the choice of creep function for standard recommendations on practical analysis of structures"

Zdeněk P. Bažant^*, El Mamoun Osman

^*Corresponding author for this work

Civil and Environmental Engineering

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

It is rather unusual to receive a discussion of authors' reply, and it is very welcomed as an indication of the interest in this topic and its importance. Since the second discussion makes it clear that some of the questions still persist, the authors are pleased to provide clarification.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	119-130
Number of pages	12
Journal	Cement and Concrete Research
Volume	7
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(77)90020-5
State	Published - Jan 1977

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Building and Construction
Materials Science(all)

Access to Document

10.1016/0008-8846(77)90020-5

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reply to Rusch, Jungwirth, and Hilsdorf's second discussion of the paper "on the choice of creep function for standard recommendations on practical analysis of structures"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{ce0eab7525af461eaf56e99aab4d8b3c,

title = "Reply to Rusch, Jungwirth, and Hilsdorf's second discussion of the paper {"}on the choice of creep function for standard recommendations on practical analysis of structures{"}",

abstract = "It is rather unusual to receive a discussion of authors' reply, and it is very welcomed as an indication of the interest in this topic and its importance. Since the second discussion makes it clear that some of the questions still persist, the authors are pleased to provide clarification.",

author = "Ba{\v z}ant, {Zden{\v e}k P.} and Osman, {El Mamoun}",

year = "1977",

month = jan,

doi = "10.1016/0008-8846(77)90020-5",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "7",

pages = "119--130",

journal = "Cement and Concrete Research",

issn = "0008-8846",

publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to Rusch, Jungwirth, and Hilsdorf's second discussion of the paper "on the choice of creep function for standard recommendations on practical analysis of structures"

AU - Bažant, Zdeněk P.

AU - Osman, El Mamoun

PY - 1977/1

Y1 - 1977/1

N2 - It is rather unusual to receive a discussion of authors' reply, and it is very welcomed as an indication of the interest in this topic and its importance. Since the second discussion makes it clear that some of the questions still persist, the authors are pleased to provide clarification.

AB - It is rather unusual to receive a discussion of authors' reply, and it is very welcomed as an indication of the interest in this topic and its importance. Since the second discussion makes it clear that some of the questions still persist, the authors are pleased to provide clarification.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49349139148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=49349139148&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/0008-8846(77)90020-5

DO - 10.1016/0008-8846(77)90020-5

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:49349139148

VL - 7

SP - 119

EP - 130

JO - Cement and Concrete Research

JF - Cement and Concrete Research

SN - 0008-8846

IS - 1

ER -

Reply to Rusch, Jungwirth, and Hilsdorf's second discussion of the paper "on the choice of creep function for standard recommendations on practical analysis of structures"

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this