TY - JOUR
T1 - Reporting Guideline for RULER
T2 - Rasch Reporting Guideline for Rehabilitation Research: Explanation and Elaboration
AU - Van de Winckel, Ann
AU - Kozlowski, Allan J.
AU - Johnston, Mark V.
AU - Weaver, Jennifer
AU - Grampurohit, Namrata
AU - Terhorst, Lauren
AU - Juengst, Shannon
AU - Ehrlich-Jones, Linda
AU - Heinemann, Allen W.
AU - Melvin, John
AU - Sood, Pallavi
AU - Mallinson, Trudy
N1 - Funding Information:
Dr Mallinson and Ms Weaver report funding from the US Department of Defense under grant JW150040 (Dr Theresa Bender-Pape, PI).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
PY - 2022/7
Y1 - 2022/7
N2 - The Rasch Reporting Guideline for Rehabilitation Research (RULER) provides peer-reviewed, evidence-based, transparent, and consistent recommendations for reporting studies that apply Rasch Measurement (RM) Theory in a rehabilitation context. The purpose of the guideline is to ensure that authors, reviewers, and editors have uniform guidance about how to write and evaluate research on rehabilitation outcome assessments. The RULER statement includes an organizing framework and a checklist of 59 recommendations. This companion article supports the RULER statement by providing details about the framework, rationale for the domains and recommendations in the checklist and explaining why these considerations are important for improving consistency and transparency in reporting the results of RM studies. This article is not intended to describe how to conduct RM studies but provides rationale for the essential elements that authors should address in each domain. Consistency and transparency in reporting RM studies will advance rehabilitation research if authors consider these issues when planning their study and include the checklist when they submit their manuscript for peer review. A copy of the checklist can be found at [table 2 in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.013].
AB - The Rasch Reporting Guideline for Rehabilitation Research (RULER) provides peer-reviewed, evidence-based, transparent, and consistent recommendations for reporting studies that apply Rasch Measurement (RM) Theory in a rehabilitation context. The purpose of the guideline is to ensure that authors, reviewers, and editors have uniform guidance about how to write and evaluate research on rehabilitation outcome assessments. The RULER statement includes an organizing framework and a checklist of 59 recommendations. This companion article supports the RULER statement by providing details about the framework, rationale for the domains and recommendations in the checklist and explaining why these considerations are important for improving consistency and transparency in reporting the results of RM studies. This article is not intended to describe how to conduct RM studies but provides rationale for the essential elements that authors should address in each domain. Consistency and transparency in reporting RM studies will advance rehabilitation research if authors consider these issues when planning their study and include the checklist when they submit their manuscript for peer review. A copy of the checklist can be found at [table 2 in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.013].
KW - Guideline
KW - Outcome assessment, health care
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Treatment outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85129973382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85129973382&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.019
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2022.03.019
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 35436496
AN - SCOPUS:85129973382
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 103
SP - 1487
EP - 1498
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 7
ER -