Representation of stimulus speed and direction in vibrissal-sensitive regions of the trigeminal nuclei: A comparison of single unit and population responses

Aniket S. Kaloti, Erik C. Johnson, Chris S. Bresee, Stephanie N. Naufel, Matthew G. Perich, Douglas L. Jones, Mitra J Z Hartmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The rat vibrissal (whisker) system is one of the oldest and most important models for the study of active tactile sensing and sensorimotor integration. It is well established that primary sensory neurons in the trigeminal ganglion respond to deflections of one and only one whisker, and that these neurons are strongly tuned for both the speed and direction of individual whisker deflections. During active whisking behavior, however, multiple whiskers will be deflected simultaneously. Very little is known about how neurons at central levels of the trigeminal pathway integrate direction and speed information across multiple whiskers. In the present work, we investigated speed and direction coding in the trigeminal brainstem nuclei, the first stage of neural processing that exhibits multi-whisker receptive fields. Specifically, we recorded both single-unit spikes and local field potentials from fifteen sites in spinal trigeminal nucleus interpolaris and oralis while systematically varying the speed and direction of coherent whisker deflections delivered across the whisker array. For 12/15 neurons, spike rate was higher when the whisker array was stimulated from caudal to rostral rather than rostral to caudal. In addition, 10/15 neurons exhibited higher firing rates for slower stimulus speeds. Interestingly, using a simple decoding strategy for the local field potentials and spike trains, classification of speed and direction was higher for field potentials than for single unit spike trains, suggesting that the field potential is a robust reflection of population activity. Taken together, these results point to the idea that population responses in these brainstem regions in the awake animal will be strongest during behaviors that stimulate a population of whiskers with a directionally coherent motion.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere0158399
JournalPloS one
Volume11
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 27 2016

Funding

This work was supported by NSF award EFRI-BSBA-0938007 to DLJ and MJZH as well as CAREER IOS-0846088 and NIH R01-NS091439 to MJZH. ECJ was partially sponsored by NSF IGERT, Grant No. 0903622. CSB was partially sponsored by NSF IGERT: Integrative Research in Motor Control and Movement, Grant No. DGE-0903637; and by NIH T32: Training in the Neurobiology of Movement and Rehabilitation Sciences, Grant No. HD057845. SNN was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No DGE-1324585. MGP was supported by NIH T32 HD07418 and NIH F31 NS092356. We thank Martin Deschênes for helpful discussions and for highlighting the distinction between angular and directional tuning, and we thank Maxime Demers for his surgical expertise and advice.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Representation of stimulus speed and direction in vibrissal-sensitive regions of the trigeminal nuclei: A comparison of single unit and population responses'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this