Resident duty-hour restrictions - Who are we protecting? AOA critical issues

Terrance Peabody*, Steven Nestler, Clare Marx, Vincent Pellegrini

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations


As advocated by Nasca, our teaching programs must nurture professionalism and the effacement of self interest that is the core of the practice of medicine and the profession.5 The evidence to date suggests that work-hour restrictions based solely on clock-defined time limits discourage, rather than promote, the professional behavior that we desire in tomorrow's physicians. Notwithstanding any issues related to duty hours or fitness for duty, a competency-based system of medical education is both desirable and necessary in the current environment of medical education. In the absence of evidence to suggest that duty-hour limits reduce medical errors and enhance patient safety, and until we have evolved to a competency-based system of resident education, a misguided and overzealous focus on limiting work hours should not be allowed to exert the unintended consequence of eroding the ethos of professionalism that we, and our patients, have come to expect of a physician.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e131.1-e131.7
JournalThe Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
Issue number17
StatePublished - Sep 5 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine


Dive into the research topics of 'Resident duty-hour restrictions - Who are we protecting? AOA critical issues'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this