TY - JOUR
T1 - Resisting temptation for the good of the group
T2 - Binding moral values and the moralization of self-control
AU - Mooijman, Marlon
AU - Meindl, Peter
AU - Meindl, Peter
AU - Oyserman, Daphna
AU - Monterosso, John
AU - Dehghani, Morteza
AU - Doris, John M.
AU - Graham, Jesse
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Psychological Association.
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - When do people see self-control as a moral issue? We hypothesize that the group-focused "binding" moral values of Loyalty/betrayal, Authority/subversion, and Purity/degradation play a particularly important role in this moralization process. Nine studies provide support for this prediction. First, moralization of self-control goals (e.g., losing weight, saving money) is more strongly associated with endorsing binding moral values than with endorsing individualizing moral values (Care/harm, Fairness/ cheating). Second, binding moral values mediate the effect of other group-focused predictors of self-control moralization, including conservatism, religiosity, and collectivism. Third, guiding participants to consider morality as centrally about binding moral values increases moralization of self-control more than guiding participants to consider morality as centrally about individualizing moral values. Fourth, we replicate our core finding that moralization of self-control is associated with binding moral values across studies differing in measures and design-whether we measure the relationship between moral and self-control language across time, the perceived moral relevance of self-control behaviors, or the moral condemnation of self-control failures. Taken together, our findings suggest that self-control moralization is primarily group-oriented and is sensitive to group-oriented cues.
AB - When do people see self-control as a moral issue? We hypothesize that the group-focused "binding" moral values of Loyalty/betrayal, Authority/subversion, and Purity/degradation play a particularly important role in this moralization process. Nine studies provide support for this prediction. First, moralization of self-control goals (e.g., losing weight, saving money) is more strongly associated with endorsing binding moral values than with endorsing individualizing moral values (Care/harm, Fairness/ cheating). Second, binding moral values mediate the effect of other group-focused predictors of self-control moralization, including conservatism, religiosity, and collectivism. Third, guiding participants to consider morality as centrally about binding moral values increases moralization of self-control more than guiding participants to consider morality as centrally about individualizing moral values. Fourth, we replicate our core finding that moralization of self-control is associated with binding moral values across studies differing in measures and design-whether we measure the relationship between moral and self-control language across time, the perceived moral relevance of self-control behaviors, or the moral condemnation of self-control failures. Taken together, our findings suggest that self-control moralization is primarily group-oriented and is sensitive to group-oriented cues.
KW - Binding foundations
KW - Moral foundations theory
KW - Self-control moralization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85021762050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85021762050&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1037/pspp0000149
DO - 10.1037/pspp0000149
M3 - Article
C2 - 28604018
AN - SCOPUS:85021762050
SN - 0022-3514
VL - 115
SP - 585
EP - 599
JO - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
JF - Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
IS - 3
ER -