TY - JOUR
T1 - Resolving evolutionary relationships in the lichen-forming genus Porpidia and related allies (Porpidiaceae, Ascomycota)
AU - Buschbom, Jutta
AU - Mueller, Gregory
N1 - Funding Information:
The first author would like to thank I. Brodo (CANL), E.S. Hansen (C), R. Harris (NY), H. Hertel (M), R. Moberg (UPS), F. Oberwinkler (GZU), G. Rambold (M), C. Wetmore (MIN), and especially A. Fryday (MSC) for sharing their expertise of Porpidia, many fruitful discussions on the subject, collection support as well as access to the respective herbaria. B. Coppins, C. Roux, and R. Bettner kindly collected material. R. Poulsen made available collections from the Kerguelen Islands for DNA-extraction; K. Glew a specimen from Mt. Rainier, Washington, USA. T. Lumbsch offered helpful comments on the manuscript. F. Lutzoni provided advice in the early stages of the project. Research stations in Schefferville and Iqaluit (Canada), Qeqertarsuaq (Greenland), Abisko (Sweden), and Kevo (Finland) provided support during fieldwork. The Nunavut Research Institute, Qikiqtani Inuit Association, Danish Polar Center and National Park Service of Canada enabled collection work on Baffin Island, Greenland, and Vancouver Island. This study was supported by a NSF DDIG Grant (DEB-0105024), as well as awards and grants from the American Society of Plant Taxonomists, the Botanical Society of America, the Explorers Club, Scott Polar Research Institute and the University of Chicago Graduate Student Hinds Fund. Visits to the herbarium at Michigan State University were supported by NSF Grant DBI-9808735 to A. Pranther. J.B. received fellowships from the German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD), the Field Museum of Natural History and the Mycological Society of America.
PY - 2004/7
Y1 - 2004/7
N2 - The lichen-forming genus Porpidia (Porpidiaceae, Ascomycota) provides excellent opportunities for evolutionary, reproductive, and ecological studies of crustose epilithic lichen symbioses. However, despite the fact that the genus itself seemed to be clearly delimited, the group was thought to be a hopeless case with regard to intrageneric relationships and species delimitations due to apparently rampant homoplasy throughout most character systems. Contrary to the situation for non-molecular data, a robust and generally well-resolved phylogeny was recovered based on DNA-sequence data. Separate and combined analyses of nuclear ribosomal RNA large subunit and nuclear β-tubulin gene fragments were performed using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Branch support was estimated using non-parametic bootstrapping and posterior probabilities, while monophyly of a priori defined groups was tested using posterior probabilities. The results reveal a highly supported "Porpidia sensu lato," however, Porpidia itself is not monophyletic. Several smaller genera of the Porpidiaceae and probably the large genus Lecidea (Lecideaceae) are nested within the group. Most taxa analyzed fall into one of four major subgroups within Porpidia s.l., though the basal relationships among these subgroups could not be supported. This phylogeny will make it possible to re-evaluate morphological and chemical characters in the group, and to conduct detailed studies of species delimitations within the monophyletic subgroups.
AB - The lichen-forming genus Porpidia (Porpidiaceae, Ascomycota) provides excellent opportunities for evolutionary, reproductive, and ecological studies of crustose epilithic lichen symbioses. However, despite the fact that the genus itself seemed to be clearly delimited, the group was thought to be a hopeless case with regard to intrageneric relationships and species delimitations due to apparently rampant homoplasy throughout most character systems. Contrary to the situation for non-molecular data, a robust and generally well-resolved phylogeny was recovered based on DNA-sequence data. Separate and combined analyses of nuclear ribosomal RNA large subunit and nuclear β-tubulin gene fragments were performed using maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian approaches. Branch support was estimated using non-parametic bootstrapping and posterior probabilities, while monophyly of a priori defined groups was tested using posterior probabilities. The results reveal a highly supported "Porpidia sensu lato," however, Porpidia itself is not monophyletic. Several smaller genera of the Porpidiaceae and probably the large genus Lecidea (Lecideaceae) are nested within the group. Most taxa analyzed fall into one of four major subgroups within Porpidia s.l., though the basal relationships among these subgroups could not be supported. This phylogeny will make it possible to re-evaluate morphological and chemical characters in the group, and to conduct detailed studies of species delimitations within the monophyletic subgroups.
KW - Ascomycota
KW - Homoplasy
KW - Lecanorales
KW - Molecular phylogenetics
KW - Porpidia
KW - Resolution
KW - Taxon sampling
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=3042786372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=3042786372&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.11.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ympev.2003.11.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 15186798
AN - SCOPUS:3042786372
SN - 1055-7903
VL - 32
SP - 66
EP - 82
JO - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
JF - Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
IS - 1
ER -