Respects for Similarity

Douglas L. Medin*, Robert L. Goldstone, Dedre Gentner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

630 Scopus citations

Abstract

This article reviews the status of similarity as an explanatory construct with a focus on similarity judgments. For similarity to be a useful construct, one must be able to specify the ways or respects in which two things are similar. One solution to this problem is to restrict the notion of similarity to hard-wired perceptual processes. It is argued that this view is too narrow and limiting. Instead, it is proposed that an important source of constraints derives from the similarity comparison process itself. Both new experiments and other evidence are described that support the idea that respects are determined by processes internal to comparisons.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)254-278
Number of pages25
JournalPsychological Review
Volume100
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1993

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Psychology(all)

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Respects for Similarity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this