Response of reinforced concrete beams at high strain rates

Shrikrishna M. Kulkarni, Surendra P. Shah

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

107 Scopus citations

Abstract

A closed-loop servohydraulic testing machine was used to conduct high rate tests on reinforced concrete beams. Seven pairs of singly reinforced beams (without shear reinforcement) were tested under displacement control. From each pair, one beam was tested at a "static" rate (piston velocity = 0.00071 cm/sec) and the other at a "high" rate (piston velocity = 38 cm/ sec). The total number of cracks reduced significantly at the high rate. Peak load and energy absorption capacity were found to increase with the rate of straining. The load-deflection curves for beams failing in flexure at the high rate did not show a sharp "yield point" or a "yield plateau." A standard sectional analysis using rate-dependent constitutive relationships does not adequately predict the shape of the high-rate load-deflection curve. Localized yielding of steel at higher strain rates is believed to be a cause for this. Computations to support this hypothesis are presented. For three of the pairs tested, final failure mode shifted from shear failure at the static rate to flexural failure at the high rate. This phenomenon is the opposite of the brittle transition in the mode of failure reported by some other researchers. It is tentatively proposed herein that this apparent contradiction can be explained on the basis of the rate sensitivity of the different steels used in these studies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)705-715
Number of pages11
JournalACI Structural Journal
Volume95
Issue number6
StatePublished - Nov 1 1998

Keywords

  • Ductility
  • Dynamic loads
  • Earthquakes
  • Flexural strength
  • Impact
  • Reinforced concrete
  • Shear failure

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Building and Construction

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Response of reinforced concrete beams at high strain rates'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this