TY - JOUR
T1 - Responsive Neurostimulation in Drug-Resistant Pediatric Epilepsy
T2 - Findings From the Epilepsy Surgery Subgroup of the Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium
AU - PERC Surgery Registry Workgroup
AU - Singh, Rani K.
AU - Eschbach, Krista
AU - Samanta, Debopam
AU - Perry, M. Scott
AU - Liu, Gang
AU - Alexander, Allyson L.
AU - Wong-Kisiel, Lily
AU - Ostendorf, Adam
AU - Tatachar, Priyamvada
AU - Reddy, Shilpa B.
AU - McCormack, Michael J.
AU - Manuel, Chad M.
AU - Gonzalez-Giraldo, Ernesto
AU - Numis, Adam L.
AU - Wolf, Steven
AU - Karia, Samir
AU - Karakas, Cemal
AU - Olaya, Joffre
AU - Shrey, Daniel
AU - Auguste, Kurtis I.
AU - Depositario-Cabacar, Dewi
AU - Romanowski, Erin Fedak
AU - McNamara, Nancy
AU - Gaillard, William D.
AU - Oluigbo, Chima
AU - Koop, Jennifer
AU - Andrade-Machado, Rene
AU - Javarayee, Pradeep
AU - Grinspan, Zachary
AU - Nangia, Srishti
AU - Bolton, Jeffrey
AU - Ciliberto, Michael
AU - Auguste, Kurtis
AU - Numis, Adam
AU - Sullivan, Joseph
AU - Coryell, Jason
AU - Gedela, Satya
AU - Hauptman, Jason
AU - Armstrong, Dallas
AU - Marashly, Ahmad
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2023/6
Y1 - 2023/6
N2 - Background: Responsive neurostimulation (RNS), a closed-loop intracranial electrical stimulation system, is a palliative surgical option for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). RNS is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients aged ≥18 years with pharmacoresistant partial seizures. The published experience of RNS in children is limited. Methods: This is a combined prospective and retrospective study of patients aged ≤18 years undergoing RNS placement. Patients were identified from the multicenter Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium Surgery Registry from January 2018 to December 2021, and additional data relevant to this study were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results: Fifty-six patients received RNS during the study period. The mean age at implantation was 14.9 years; the mean duration of epilepsy, 8.1 years; and the mean number of previously trialed antiseizure medications, 4.2. Five patients (9%) previously trialed dietary therapy, and 19 patients (34%) underwent prior surgery. Most patients (70%) underwent invasive electroencephalography evaluation before RNS implantation. Complications occurred in three patients (5.3%) including malpositioned leads or transient weakness. Follow-up (mean 11.7 months) was available for 55 patients (one lost), and four were seizure-free with RNS off. Outcome analysis of stimulation efficacy was available for 51 patients: 33 patients (65%) were responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency), including five patients (10%) who were seizure free at follow-up. Conclusions: For young patients with focal DRE who are not candidates for surgical resection, neuromodulation should be considered. Although RNS is off-label for patients aged <18 years, this multicenter study suggests that it is a safe and effective palliative option for children with focal DRE.
AB - Background: Responsive neurostimulation (RNS), a closed-loop intracranial electrical stimulation system, is a palliative surgical option for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). RNS is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients aged ≥18 years with pharmacoresistant partial seizures. The published experience of RNS in children is limited. Methods: This is a combined prospective and retrospective study of patients aged ≤18 years undergoing RNS placement. Patients were identified from the multicenter Pediatric Epilepsy Research Consortium Surgery Registry from January 2018 to December 2021, and additional data relevant to this study were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Results: Fifty-six patients received RNS during the study period. The mean age at implantation was 14.9 years; the mean duration of epilepsy, 8.1 years; and the mean number of previously trialed antiseizure medications, 4.2. Five patients (9%) previously trialed dietary therapy, and 19 patients (34%) underwent prior surgery. Most patients (70%) underwent invasive electroencephalography evaluation before RNS implantation. Complications occurred in three patients (5.3%) including malpositioned leads or transient weakness. Follow-up (mean 11.7 months) was available for 55 patients (one lost), and four were seizure-free with RNS off. Outcome analysis of stimulation efficacy was available for 51 patients: 33 patients (65%) were responders (≥50% reduction in seizure frequency), including five patients (10%) who were seizure free at follow-up. Conclusions: For young patients with focal DRE who are not candidates for surgical resection, neuromodulation should be considered. Although RNS is off-label for patients aged <18 years, this multicenter study suggests that it is a safe and effective palliative option for children with focal DRE.
KW - Drug-resistant epilepsy
KW - Epilepsy surgery
KW - Neuromodulation
KW - Pediatric epilepsy
KW - Responsive neurostimulation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85159761268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85159761268&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.03.001
DO - 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2023.03.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 37084698
AN - SCOPUS:85159761268
SN - 0887-8994
VL - 143
SP - 106
EP - 112
JO - Pediatric neurology
JF - Pediatric neurology
ER -