TY - JOUR
T1 - Responsiveness, minimal detectable change, and minimally clinically important differences for the disorders of consciousness scale
AU - Mallinson, Trudy
AU - Pape, Theresa Louise Bender
AU - Guernon, Ann
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was funded by Department of Veterans Affairs, Office of Research and Development, Health Services Research and Development merit grant # CCN 07-133-1 and Rehabilitation Research and Development Career Development Transition Award # B4949N to T. Pape. The authors thank the study participants and their families and the Nick Kot Chartiy for TBI (www.nkc4tbi.com) for their ongoing support of severe TBI research.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Objectives: To determine the responsiveness, minimal detectable change (MDC95), and minimally clinically important difference (MCID) of the Disorders of Consciousness Scale (DOCS-25) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to report the percentages of patients' change scores exceeding MDC and MCID after 3 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation. Setting: Post-acute rehabilitation hospitals. Participants: One hundred seventy-two patients with severe TBI. Ninety-two were included in the DOCS-25 3-week analysis. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Main Measure(s): Disorders of Consciousness Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale. Results: The effect size and standardized response mean of the DOCS-25 for those who improved were 0.45 and 1.3, respectively-moderate to large by Cohen criteria. The MDC95 (95% confidence interval) was 5.6. Distribution-based MCIDs for small (0.20 SD), moderate (0.33 SD), and large (0.50 SD) differences were 2.6 units, 4.4 units, and 6.6 units, respectively. The anchor-based MCID was 8.6 units. On average, patients who improved (n = 57) gained 14.5 units by week 3, exceeding the anchor-basedMCID. On average, patients who did not improve (n = 35) declined by 7.2 units, which exceeds both the MDC95 and the largest distribution-based MCID. Conclusion(s): The DOCS-25 is a responsive, clinician-observed assessment tool for capturing change in neurobehavioral function in adults recovering from severe TBI. This is the first study to provide evidence for the size of neurobehavioral function change that might indicate meaningful recovery in patients with severe TBI. Results from this study may support future research by better informing sample size calculations for clinical trials and also assist clinicians in identifying when variation in level of consciousness is consequential enough to warrant changes in intervention.
AB - Objectives: To determine the responsiveness, minimal detectable change (MDC95), and minimally clinically important difference (MCID) of the Disorders of Consciousness Scale (DOCS-25) in patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) and to report the percentages of patients' change scores exceeding MDC and MCID after 3 weeks of inpatient rehabilitation. Setting: Post-acute rehabilitation hospitals. Participants: One hundred seventy-two patients with severe TBI. Ninety-two were included in the DOCS-25 3-week analysis. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Main Measure(s): Disorders of Consciousness Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale. Results: The effect size and standardized response mean of the DOCS-25 for those who improved were 0.45 and 1.3, respectively-moderate to large by Cohen criteria. The MDC95 (95% confidence interval) was 5.6. Distribution-based MCIDs for small (0.20 SD), moderate (0.33 SD), and large (0.50 SD) differences were 2.6 units, 4.4 units, and 6.6 units, respectively. The anchor-based MCID was 8.6 units. On average, patients who improved (n = 57) gained 14.5 units by week 3, exceeding the anchor-basedMCID. On average, patients who did not improve (n = 35) declined by 7.2 units, which exceeds both the MDC95 and the largest distribution-based MCID. Conclusion(s): The DOCS-25 is a responsive, clinician-observed assessment tool for capturing change in neurobehavioral function in adults recovering from severe TBI. This is the first study to provide evidence for the size of neurobehavioral function change that might indicate meaningful recovery in patients with severe TBI. Results from this study may support future research by better informing sample size calculations for clinical trials and also assist clinicians in identifying when variation in level of consciousness is consequential enough to warrant changes in intervention.
KW - Brain injury
KW - Disorders of consciousness
KW - Outcome measures
KW - Rehabilitation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84944345876&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84944345876&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000184
DO - 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000184
M3 - Article
C2 - 26360003
AN - SCOPUS:84944345876
SN - 0885-9701
VL - 31
SP - E43-E51
JO - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
JF - Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
IS - 4
ER -