TY - JOUR
T1 - Restenosis after Carotid Stent Placement in Patients with Previous Neck Irradiation or Endarterectomy
AU - Eskandari, Mark K.
AU - Brown, Katherine E.
AU - Kibbe, Melina R.
AU - Morasch, Mark D.
AU - Matsumura, Jon S.
AU - Pearce, William H.
PY - 2007/11
Y1 - 2007/11
N2 - Purpose: Placement of a carotid artery stent (CAS) is an appealing treatment option for patients who have undergone neck irradiation or endarterectomy. Early outcomes and restenosis rates in these patients were analyzed and compared with those in de novo lesions. Materials and Methods: Single-center, retrospective review of 269 CAS procedures that used cerebral embolic protection and nitinol stents was conducted from May 2001 through July 2006. In this cohort, 66 procedures were performed in patients with a history of external-beam neck irradiation (n = 26) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA; n = 40), designated as the "hostile neck" group. Mean follow-up was 16 months. Results: The 30-day event rate for the entire group included major ipsilateral stroke (1.1%), minor posterior stroke (1.1%), and myocardial death (0.4%); none occurred in the hostile neck group. The rate of restenosis or occlusion for all 269 arteries was 2.6%. There was no significant difference in restenosis or occlusion rates between de novo lesions (2.0%, four of 203) and the hostile neck group (4.5%, three of 66; P = .17). Repeat angioplasty with or without stent implantation was employed for all patients with restenosis and resulted in no periprocedural stroke, death, or subsequent restenosis. Conclusions: Periprocedural outcomes of CAS procedures are similar in de novo lesions as in patients with a history of neck irradiation or CEA. Importantly, restenosis requiring repeat intervention remains uncommon, and its incidence is comparable between groups.
AB - Purpose: Placement of a carotid artery stent (CAS) is an appealing treatment option for patients who have undergone neck irradiation or endarterectomy. Early outcomes and restenosis rates in these patients were analyzed and compared with those in de novo lesions. Materials and Methods: Single-center, retrospective review of 269 CAS procedures that used cerebral embolic protection and nitinol stents was conducted from May 2001 through July 2006. In this cohort, 66 procedures were performed in patients with a history of external-beam neck irradiation (n = 26) or carotid endarterectomy (CEA; n = 40), designated as the "hostile neck" group. Mean follow-up was 16 months. Results: The 30-day event rate for the entire group included major ipsilateral stroke (1.1%), minor posterior stroke (1.1%), and myocardial death (0.4%); none occurred in the hostile neck group. The rate of restenosis or occlusion for all 269 arteries was 2.6%. There was no significant difference in restenosis or occlusion rates between de novo lesions (2.0%, four of 203) and the hostile neck group (4.5%, three of 66; P = .17). Repeat angioplasty with or without stent implantation was employed for all patients with restenosis and resulted in no periprocedural stroke, death, or subsequent restenosis. Conclusions: Periprocedural outcomes of CAS procedures are similar in de novo lesions as in patients with a history of neck irradiation or CEA. Importantly, restenosis requiring repeat intervention remains uncommon, and its incidence is comparable between groups.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=35448971071&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=35448971071&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.07.014
DO - 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.07.014
M3 - Article
C2 - 18003986
AN - SCOPUS:35448971071
SN - 1051-0443
VL - 18
SP - 1368
EP - 1374
JO - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
JF - Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
IS - 11
ER -