Rethinking Race and Power in Design-Based Research

Reflections from the Field

Sepehr Vakil*, Maxine McKinney de Royston, Na'ilah Suad Nasir, Ben Kirshner

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

18 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Participatory design-based research continues to expand and challenge the “researcher” and “researched” paradigm by incorporating teachers, administrators, community members, and youth throughout the research process. Yet, greater clarity is needed about the racial and political dimensions of these collaborative research projects. In this article, we focus on how race and power mediate relationships between researchers and communities in ways that significantly shape the process of research. Using the notion of politicized trust as a conceptual lens, we reflect on two distinct participatory design projects to explore how political and racial solidarity was established, contested, and negotiated throughout the course of the design process. Ultimately, this article argues that making visible how race and power mediate relationships in design research is critical for engaging in ethical and sociopolitically conscious relationships with community partners and developing theoretical and practical knowledge about the repertoires of practice, tasks, and sociocultural competencies demanded of university researchers.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)194-209
Number of pages16
JournalCognition and Instruction
Volume34
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2 2016

Fingerprint

Research Design
Research Personnel
Research
community
research process
Administrative Personnel
Lenses
solidarity
research planning
research project
paradigm
university
teacher
Power (Psychology)

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Psychology(all)

Cite this

Vakil, Sepehr ; McKinney de Royston, Maxine ; Suad Nasir, Na'ilah ; Kirshner, Ben. / Rethinking Race and Power in Design-Based Research : Reflections from the Field. In: Cognition and Instruction. 2016 ; Vol. 34, No. 3. pp. 194-209.
@article{4881c6657f2d4e4cab184fdec2385628,
title = "Rethinking Race and Power in Design-Based Research: Reflections from the Field",
abstract = "Participatory design-based research continues to expand and challenge the “researcher” and “researched” paradigm by incorporating teachers, administrators, community members, and youth throughout the research process. Yet, greater clarity is needed about the racial and political dimensions of these collaborative research projects. In this article, we focus on how race and power mediate relationships between researchers and communities in ways that significantly shape the process of research. Using the notion of politicized trust as a conceptual lens, we reflect on two distinct participatory design projects to explore how political and racial solidarity was established, contested, and negotiated throughout the course of the design process. Ultimately, this article argues that making visible how race and power mediate relationships in design research is critical for engaging in ethical and sociopolitically conscious relationships with community partners and developing theoretical and practical knowledge about the repertoires of practice, tasks, and sociocultural competencies demanded of university researchers.",
author = "Sepehr Vakil and {McKinney de Royston}, Maxine and {Suad Nasir}, Na'ilah and Ben Kirshner",
year = "2016",
month = "7",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/07370008.2016.1169817",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "34",
pages = "194--209",
journal = "Cognition and Instruction",
issn = "0737-0008",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "3",

}

Rethinking Race and Power in Design-Based Research : Reflections from the Field. / Vakil, Sepehr; McKinney de Royston, Maxine; Suad Nasir, Na'ilah; Kirshner, Ben.

In: Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 34, No. 3, 02.07.2016, p. 194-209.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking Race and Power in Design-Based Research

T2 - Reflections from the Field

AU - Vakil, Sepehr

AU - McKinney de Royston, Maxine

AU - Suad Nasir, Na'ilah

AU - Kirshner, Ben

PY - 2016/7/2

Y1 - 2016/7/2

N2 - Participatory design-based research continues to expand and challenge the “researcher” and “researched” paradigm by incorporating teachers, administrators, community members, and youth throughout the research process. Yet, greater clarity is needed about the racial and political dimensions of these collaborative research projects. In this article, we focus on how race and power mediate relationships between researchers and communities in ways that significantly shape the process of research. Using the notion of politicized trust as a conceptual lens, we reflect on two distinct participatory design projects to explore how political and racial solidarity was established, contested, and negotiated throughout the course of the design process. Ultimately, this article argues that making visible how race and power mediate relationships in design research is critical for engaging in ethical and sociopolitically conscious relationships with community partners and developing theoretical and practical knowledge about the repertoires of practice, tasks, and sociocultural competencies demanded of university researchers.

AB - Participatory design-based research continues to expand and challenge the “researcher” and “researched” paradigm by incorporating teachers, administrators, community members, and youth throughout the research process. Yet, greater clarity is needed about the racial and political dimensions of these collaborative research projects. In this article, we focus on how race and power mediate relationships between researchers and communities in ways that significantly shape the process of research. Using the notion of politicized trust as a conceptual lens, we reflect on two distinct participatory design projects to explore how political and racial solidarity was established, contested, and negotiated throughout the course of the design process. Ultimately, this article argues that making visible how race and power mediate relationships in design research is critical for engaging in ethical and sociopolitically conscious relationships with community partners and developing theoretical and practical knowledge about the repertoires of practice, tasks, and sociocultural competencies demanded of university researchers.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84975257552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84975257552&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/07370008.2016.1169817

DO - 10.1080/07370008.2016.1169817

M3 - Article

VL - 34

SP - 194

EP - 209

JO - Cognition and Instruction

JF - Cognition and Instruction

SN - 0737-0008

IS - 3

ER -