TY - JOUR
T1 - Retribution and emotional regulation
T2 - The effects of time delay in angry economic interactions
AU - Wang, Cynthia S.
AU - Sivanathan, Niro
AU - Narayanan, Jayanth
AU - Ganegoda, Deshani B.
AU - Bauer, Monika
AU - Bodenhausen, Galen V.
AU - Murnighan, Keith
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was supported by research grants from the National University of Singapore (R-317-000-073-112/133 and R-317-000-068-112/133) and the Northwestern University Dispute Resolution Research Center.
PY - 2011/9
Y1 - 2011/9
N2 - Individuals driven by negative emotions often punish non-cooperators at a cost to themselves. The current research demonstrates that, although time delays can attenuate this effect, they can also produce unintended consequences. Five experiments investigated the effects of time delays and thought patterns on punishments in direct and third party interactions. The results show that time delays decreased punishment (Experiment 1) by reducing negative emotions (Experiments 2A and 2B). However, thought patterns during a delay were crucially important (Experiments 3A and 3B): People who engaged in a distraction task punished less; people who engaged in affective rumination punished more; and people who engaged in cognitive reappraisal were unaffected by a delay. These differences meant that, after a time delay, affective ruminators administered greater punishments than cognitive reappraisers or distracted individuals. Implications of these findings for managing punitive impulses via time delays are discussed.
AB - Individuals driven by negative emotions often punish non-cooperators at a cost to themselves. The current research demonstrates that, although time delays can attenuate this effect, they can also produce unintended consequences. Five experiments investigated the effects of time delays and thought patterns on punishments in direct and third party interactions. The results show that time delays decreased punishment (Experiment 1) by reducing negative emotions (Experiments 2A and 2B). However, thought patterns during a delay were crucially important (Experiments 3A and 3B): People who engaged in a distraction task punished less; people who engaged in affective rumination punished more; and people who engaged in cognitive reappraisal were unaffected by a delay. These differences meant that, after a time delay, affective ruminators administered greater punishments than cognitive reappraisers or distracted individuals. Implications of these findings for managing punitive impulses via time delays are discussed.
KW - Anger
KW - Emotional regulation
KW - Retribution
KW - Rumination
KW - Time delay
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960835284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960835284&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.007
DO - 10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.05.007
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:79960835284
SN - 0749-5978
VL - 116
SP - 46
EP - 54
JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
IS - 1
ER -