Abstract
Background:Some melanomas closely resemble pigmented spindle cell nevi (PSCN) of Reed histologically. The distinction of these entities is important for clinical management. A recent study showed most PSCN (78%) are fusion-driven, commonly involving NTRK3 (57%). Conversely, BRAF V600E mutations are not characteristic of PSCN but are frequent in melanoma.Objective:In this study, we assessed clinical, histologic and genomic differences between PSCN of Reed and Reed-like melanomas (RLMs).Methods:We performed BRAF V600E immunohistochemistry (IHC) for 18 PSCN and 20 RLM cases. All 23 benign PSCN cases previously underwent whole transcriptome and targeted DNA sequencing with a 1711 gene panel.Results:We previously demonstrated the majority of PSCN (18 of 23) has chimeric fusions. Among PSCN without a chimeric fusion, BRAF mutations were common. Noncanonical BRAF mutations were identified in 2 of 5 nonfusion cases, and 1 case had a canonical BRAF mutation. Alternatively, 70% of RLM demonstrated a BRAF V600E mutation. RLM also occurred more frequently in older patients.Limitations:The overall sample size was small.Conclusions:In diagnostically challenging cases, ancillary IHC studies can assist in distinguishing PSCN from RLM. Our study suggests positive staining by IHC for BRAF V600E and older age strongly favors a diagnosis of RLM.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 641-647 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | American Journal of Dermatopathology |
Volume | 42 |
Issue number | 9 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Sep 1 2020 |
Keywords
- BRAF V600E
- Reed melanoma
- Spitz
- immunohistochemistry
- pigmented spindle cell nevus
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Dermatology
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine