TY - JOUR
T1 - Reversing the gender gap in negotiations
T2 - An exploration of stereotype regeneration
AU - Kray, Laura J.
AU - Galinsky, Adam D.
AU - Thompson, Leigh
N1 - Funding Information:
The data reported were collected while the second author was a postdoctoral fellow at Northwestern University. This research was supported by two grants from the National Science Foundation (SES-0073682 awarded to Laura Kray and SES-9870892 awarded to Leigh Thompson).
PY - 2002
Y1 - 2002
N2 - We examine how gender stereotypes affect performance in mixed-gender negotiations. We extend recent work demonstrating that stereotype activation leads to a male advantage and a complementary female disadvantage at the bargaining table (Kray, Thompson, & Galinsky, 2001). In the present investigation, we regenerate the stereotype of effective negotiators by associating stereotypically feminine skills with negotiation success. In Experiment 1, women performed better in mixed-gender negotiations when stereotypically feminine traits were linked to successful negotiating, but not when gender-neutral traits were linked to negotiation success. Gender differences were mediated by the performance expectations and goals set by negotiators. In Experiment 2, we regenerated the stereotype of effective negotiators by linking stereotypically masculine or feminine traits with negotiation ineffectiveness. Women outperformed men in mixed-gender negotiations when stereotypically masculine traits were linked to poor negotiation performance, but men outperformed women when stereotypically feminine traits were linked to poor negotiation performance. Implications for stereotype threat theory and negotiations are discussed.
AB - We examine how gender stereotypes affect performance in mixed-gender negotiations. We extend recent work demonstrating that stereotype activation leads to a male advantage and a complementary female disadvantage at the bargaining table (Kray, Thompson, & Galinsky, 2001). In the present investigation, we regenerate the stereotype of effective negotiators by associating stereotypically feminine skills with negotiation success. In Experiment 1, women performed better in mixed-gender negotiations when stereotypically feminine traits were linked to successful negotiating, but not when gender-neutral traits were linked to negotiation success. Gender differences were mediated by the performance expectations and goals set by negotiators. In Experiment 2, we regenerated the stereotype of effective negotiators by linking stereotypically masculine or feminine traits with negotiation ineffectiveness. Women outperformed men in mixed-gender negotiations when stereotypically masculine traits were linked to poor negotiation performance, but men outperformed women when stereotypically feminine traits were linked to poor negotiation performance. Implications for stereotype threat theory and negotiations are discussed.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0036225365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0036225365&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1006/obhd.2001.2979
DO - 10.1006/obhd.2001.2979
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0036225365
SN - 0749-5978
VL - 87
SP - 386
EP - 409
JO - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
JF - Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
IS - 2
ER -