Review of anticoagulation options for mechanical valve prosthesis

Hadi Toeg, Munir Boodhwani*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Clinical guidelines recommend lifelong oral anticoagulation (OAC) with warfarin in all patients with mechanical valves with variance in the target INR for patient associated risk factors, type of mechanical valve or implant position of the valve. Recent randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that clinicians may consider a lower OAC strategy (INR: 1.5-2.5) in low (thrombogenic) risk patients undergoing bileaflet mechanical valve replacement thereby achieving similar thromboprophylaxis yet minimizing bleeding events. Likewise, physicians may also consider a lowered OAC option in high (thrombogenic) risk patients undergoing bileaflet mechanical valve replacement yielding similar efficacy (avoidance of thromboembolic events) and improving safety (bleeding events). Finally, while advancement of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) has been swift in the realm of atrial fibrillation anticoagulation management, NOACs for mechanical valves are currently contraindicated due to evidence of increased thromboembolic and bleeding risk. Future studies comparing NOACs and warfarin along with newer mechanical valve construction are eagerly being awaited.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-281
Number of pages9
JournalInterventional Cardiology
Volume7
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Keywords

  • anticoagulation
  • antiplatelet
  • mechanical valve
  • valve surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Review of anticoagulation options for mechanical valve prosthesis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this