TY - JOUR
T1 - Risk Adjustment, Mode Adjustment, and Nonresponse Bias Analysis on Quality Measures From a Long-Term Care Hospital Experience of Care Survey
AU - Zuckerbraun, Sara M.
AU - Deutsch, Anne
AU - Eicheldinger, Celia
AU - Frasier, Alicia M.
AU - Loft, John D.
AU - Clift, Joseph B.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (contract no. HSM-500-2013-13015I HHSM-500-T0003). The views expressed here do not reflect the views of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the United States government.We thank the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Division of Quality Measurement and Division of Postacute Care, for their support of this work.
Funding Information:
Supported by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (contract no. HSM-500-2013-13015I HHSM-500-T0003 ). The views expressed here do not reflect the views of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, the Department of Health and Human Services , or the United States government.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine
PY - 2020/5
Y1 - 2020/5
N2 - Objectives: To develop a patient risk adjustment model for experience of care (EOC) quality measures for long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) that includes mode of survey administration. To assess presence of nonresponse bias in the adjusted facility-level scores. Design: We tested 3 modes of collecting the EOC data: mail-only, mixed (ie, mail with telephone follow-up), and in-facility. This study used sequential modeling and impact analysis, specified a risk and mode adjustment model, and evaluated presence of nonresponse after adjustment. Setting: LTCHs. Participants: Patients (N=1364) and 69 LTCHs. Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Risk and mode adjusted responses to 28 survey questions and 6 facility-level scores derived from survey responses. Results: Mode of data collection and patient risk variables (age, sex, overall health, overall mental health, marital status, education, race, and whether a proxy responded) were included in the model. Clinical variables were not significant. The in-facility mode was associated with significantly higher performance scores than the other modes. When the recommended risk and mode adjustment model was applied, nonresponse bias was not observed in any mode. Conclusions: LTCH EOC data should be adjusted for patient risk variables including mode of data collection.
AB - Objectives: To develop a patient risk adjustment model for experience of care (EOC) quality measures for long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) that includes mode of survey administration. To assess presence of nonresponse bias in the adjusted facility-level scores. Design: We tested 3 modes of collecting the EOC data: mail-only, mixed (ie, mail with telephone follow-up), and in-facility. This study used sequential modeling and impact analysis, specified a risk and mode adjustment model, and evaluated presence of nonresponse after adjustment. Setting: LTCHs. Participants: Patients (N=1364) and 69 LTCHs. Intervention: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Risk and mode adjusted responses to 28 survey questions and 6 facility-level scores derived from survey responses. Results: Mode of data collection and patient risk variables (age, sex, overall health, overall mental health, marital status, education, race, and whether a proxy responded) were included in the model. Clinical variables were not significant. The in-facility mode was associated with significantly higher performance scores than the other modes. When the recommended risk and mode adjustment model was applied, nonresponse bias was not observed in any mode. Conclusions: LTCH EOC data should be adjusted for patient risk variables including mode of data collection.
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Risk adjustment
KW - Surveys and questionnaires
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078793961&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078793961&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.11.016
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2019.11.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 31904343
AN - SCOPUS:85078793961
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 101
SP - 841
EP - 851
JO - Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
JF - Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation
IS - 5
ER -