Abstract
Targeted prevention of heart failure (HF) remains a critical need given the high prevalence of HF morbidity and mortality. Similar to risk-based prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, optimal HF prevention strategies should include quantification of risk in the individual patient. In this review, we discuss incorporation of a quantitative risk-based approach into the existing HF staging landscape and the clinical opportunity that exists to translate available data on risk estimation to help guide personalized decision making. We first summarize the recent development of key HF risk prediction tools that can be applied broadly at a population level to estimate risk of incident HF. Next, we provide an in-depth description of the clinical utility of biomarkers to personalize risk estimation in select patients at the highest risk of developing HF. We also discuss integration of genomics-enhanced approaches (eg, Titin [TTN]) and other risk-enhancing features to reclassify risk with a precision medicine approach to HF prevention. Although sequential testing is very likely to identify low and high-risk individuals with excellent accuracy, whether or not interventions based on these risk models prevent HF in clinical practice requires prompt attention including randomized placebo-controlled trials of candidate therapies in risk-enriched populations. We conclude with a summary of unanswered questions and gaps in evidence that must be addressed to move the field of HF risk assessment forward.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | E007761 |
Journal | Circulation: Heart Failure |
Volume | 14 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 1 2021 |
Funding
Dr Shah has received research grants from Actelion, AstraZeneca, Corvia, No-vartis, and Pfizer and has received consulting fees from Abbott, Actelion, Astra-Zeneca, Amgen, Axon Therapeutics, Bayer, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardiora, CVRx, Cytokinetics, Eisai, GSK, Ionis, Ironwood, Lilly, Merck, MyoKardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Shifamed, Tenax, and United Therapeutics. The other authors report no conflicts. Dr Sinha is supported by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health under award number T32HL069771. Dr Khan is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (KL2TR001424) and the American Heart Association (no. 19TPA34890060). Research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health’s National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, Grant Number KL2TR001424. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Keywords
- Cardiovascular disease
- Heart failure
- Mortality
- Prevalence
- Risk
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine