Risk Preferences and Misconduct: Evidence from Politicians

Dylan Blu Minor

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

When seeking new leaders, business and government organizations alike often need individuals that are less risk averse, or even risk-seeking, in order to improve performance. However, individuals amenable to increased risk-taking may be more likely to engage in misconduct. To study this issue, we explore US political scandals and the implicated politicians’ portfolio choices. We find that a politician allocating all of her portfolio to risky investments has double the odds of being involved in a political sandal compared to a politician allocating all of her portfolio to safe investments. This suggests that those who are more willing to take risks in their personal finances are also more likely to engage in misconduct. We validate portfolio choice as a measure of risk preferences by correlating actual high-stakes investment choices (average $700,000 US) to conventional laboratory lottery choices (average $51 US) of wealthy investors.
Original languageEnglish (US)
PublisherSocial Science Research Network (SSRN)
Number of pages34
StatePublished - Dec 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Risk Preferences and Misconduct: Evidence from Politicians'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Minor, D. B. (2015). Risk Preferences and Misconduct: Evidence from Politicians. Social Science Research Network (SSRN). http://ssrn.com/abstract=2711279