Routine-biased technological change and wage inequality: do workers’ perceptions matter?

Silvia Vannutelli, Sergio Scicchitano*, Marco Biagetti

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

The Routine-Biased Technological Change (RBTC) has been regarded as a relatively novel technology-based explanation of social changes affecting job and wage polarization. In this paper, we investigate wage inequality between routine and non-routine workers along the wage distribution in Italy. Thanks to unique survey data, we can estimate the wage differential using both the actual and the perceived level of routine intensity of jobs to classify workers. We adopt semi-parametric decomposition techniques to quantify the importance of worker characteristics in explaining the gaps. We also employ non-parametric techniques to account for self-selection bias. We find evidence of a significant U-shaped pattern in the wage gap, according to both definitions, with non-routine workers always earning significantly more than routine workers. Results show that worker characteristics fully explain the gap in the case of perceived routine, while they account for no more than 50% of the gap across the distribution in the case of actual routine. Thus, the results highlight the importance of taking into account workers’ perceptions to reduce the set of omitted vaiables when analyzing determinants of wage inequality.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)409-450
Number of pages42
JournalEurasian Business Review
Volume12
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2022

Keywords

  • Blinder/Oaxaca
  • Counterfactual distribution
  • Italy
  • Non-parametric methodology
  • Quantile regression
  • Routine
  • Semi-parametric methodology
  • Wage inequality

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Business, Management and Accounting
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Routine-biased technological change and wage inequality: do workers’ perceptions matter?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this