Abstract
Ruxolitinib is approved for the treatment of patients with polycythemia vera (PV) who are intolerant or resistant to hydroxyurea. While ruxolitinib discontinuation in myelofibrosis is associated with dismal outcomes, the analogous experience in PV has not been reported. Using a large, multi-institutional database of PV patients, we identified 93 patients with PV who were treated with ruxolitinib, of whom 22 discontinued therapy. Adverse events were the primary reason for discontinuation. After a median follow-up of 18.2 months following ruxolitinib discontinuation, no patients experienced a thrombotic event. One patient died 20.8 months after discontinuation. As compared with the 71 patients who were still receiving treatment with ruxolitinib at last follow up, patients who discontinued ruxolitinib were older at time of treatment initiation (67.5 versus 64.8 years, p = 0.0058), but had similar patient and disease characteristics. After discontinuation, only 4 patients (18 %) received subsequent cytoreductive therapy, including hydroxyurea in one patient and pegylated interferon α-2a in three patients. In stark contrast to the experience in myelofibrosis, discontinuation of ruxolitinib in PV was associated with generally favorable outcomes. However, there is a lack of available salvage therapies, highlighting the need for further therapeutic development in PV.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Article number | 106629 |
Journal | Leukemia Research |
Volume | 109 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Oct 2021 |
Funding
This work was supported by an unrestricted educational grant from PharmaEssentia. PharmaEssentia did not participate in the conception of the project, acquisition of data, analysis of the data, or writing of the manuscript.NP has served on the advisory board and received honoraria from Incyte and PharmaEssentia; JG has received research funding, honoraria, and served on the advisory board for Incyte, Kartos, and Protagonist Therapeutics; MH has received research funding/consulted for Novartis, Blue Medicines, PharmaEssentia; AK has served on the advisory board and received honoraria from Protagonist Therapeutics, PharmaEssentia, and Incyte; JMS has received research funding from AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, CTI Biopharma, Kartos, and Incyte and has received honoraria from Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Novartis and serves on the speakers bureau for Incyte and Bristol Myers Squibb; AF is on the speakers bureau for Incyte, Bristol Myers Squibb, and PharmaEssentia; RM has received research funding from Incyte, Gilead, CTI Biopharma, Celgene, AbbVie, and Genentech and has received honoraria from Novartis, Seirra Oncology, La Jolla Pharma and AOP Orphan; AY is on the speakers bureau for Incyte; RH is consultant for Protagonist and serves on Data Safety Monitoring Boards for Novartis and AbbVie; JM received consulting fees from Incyte, Roche, Geron, Constellation, PharmaEssentia, BMS, Celgene and Kartos and received contracted research funding paid to his institution from CTI Biopharma, Incyte, Roche, Merck, Forbius, Promedior, Novartis, Janssen and Kartos. DT, LR, CO, EM, and NZ have no conflict of interest to report.
Keywords
- Discontinuation
- Intolerance
- Polycythemia vera
- Ruxolitinib
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Cancer Research