TY - JOUR
T1 - Salience, similes, and the asymmetry of similarity
AU - Ortony, Andrew
AU - Vondruska, Richard J.
AU - Foss, Mark A.
AU - Jones, Lawrence E.
N1 - Funding Information:
The research reported here was supported in part by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. BNS-80-04541, in part by the National Institute of Education under Contract NIE-400-81-0030, and in part by a James McKeen Cattell supplemental sabbatical award, and a Spencer Fellowship awarded to the first author by the National Academy of Education. The second author is now with John C. Maloney & Associates, 620 North Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL. Special thanks are due to Stella Vosniadou for her many valuable contributions throughout the course of this research. We also thank Robert R. Hoffman for his extensive comments on an earlier draft of this paper. Reprint requests should be addressed to Andrew Ortony, Center for the Study of Reading, University of Illinois, 51 Gertz Drive, Champaign, IL 61820.
PY - 1985/10
Y1 - 1985/10
N2 - Models of similarity have traditionally assumed that the similarity relation is symmetrical. However, when reversed, similarity statements frequently have different properties from those of the original. Previous attempts to account for the asymmetry of similarity have focused only on literal comparisons, resulting in a tendency to underestimate the degree of asymmetry in nonliteral comparisons (i.e., similes). A model of similarity is proposed to account for the varying degrees of asymmetry found in all kinds of natural language comparisons. In this model, asymmetry is attributed to an imbalance in the salience of the shared attributes. Studies are reported which test key aspects of the model. The results appear to provide converging evidence for the claim that asymmetry of similarity is due at least in part to salience imbalance.
AB - Models of similarity have traditionally assumed that the similarity relation is symmetrical. However, when reversed, similarity statements frequently have different properties from those of the original. Previous attempts to account for the asymmetry of similarity have focused only on literal comparisons, resulting in a tendency to underestimate the degree of asymmetry in nonliteral comparisons (i.e., similes). A model of similarity is proposed to account for the varying degrees of asymmetry found in all kinds of natural language comparisons. In this model, asymmetry is attributed to an imbalance in the salience of the shared attributes. Studies are reported which test key aspects of the model. The results appear to provide converging evidence for the claim that asymmetry of similarity is due at least in part to salience imbalance.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000739234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0000739234&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90047-6
DO - 10.1016/0749-596X(85)90047-6
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0000739234
SN - 0749-596X
VL - 24
SP - 569
EP - 594
JO - Journal of Memory and Language
JF - Journal of Memory and Language
IS - 5
ER -