Screening for mental health problems: Addressing the base rate fallacy for a sustainable screening program in integrated primary care

John V Lavigne*, Marissa Alexis Feldman, Kathryn A Mendelsohn

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective The Affordable Care Act has stimulated interest in screening for psychological problems in primary care. Given the scale with which screening might occur, the implications of a problem known as the base rate fallacy need to be considered. Methods The concepts of sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and the base rate fallacy are discussed. The possibility that a screening program may not improve upon random selection is reviewed, as is the possibility that sequential screening might be useful. Results and Discussion Developing effective screening programs for pediatric mental health problems is highly desirable, and properly addressing the high rate of false positives may improve the likelihood that such programs can be sustained. Consideration needs to be given to the use of sequential screening, which has both advantages and disadvantages, depending upon the type of problem to be screened for and the availability of resources for follow-up evaluations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1081-1090
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Pediatric Psychology
Volume41
Issue number10
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2016

Keywords

  • Base rate fallacy
  • Integrated primary care
  • Primary care
  • Screening

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Screening for mental health problems: Addressing the base rate fallacy for a sustainable screening program in integrated primary care'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this