TY - JOUR
T1 - Secrecy, Trust, and Dangerous Leisure
T2 - Generating Group Cohesion in Voluntary Organizations
AU - Fine, Gary Alan
AU - Holyfield, Lori
PY - 1996/3
Y1 - 1996/3
N2 - The development and effects of group cohesion have been a long-standing concern in the small-group literature. Through an ethnographic examination of a leisure activity involving risk-mushroom collecting-we analyze how voluntary leisure groups maintain members' allegiance and affiliation, and thus create cohesion. Trust (communal concern) and secrecy (individual self-interest), based originally on information and subsequently on relationships, are critical to group stability. Groups provide arenas in which new members can place their trust in "experts," thus receiving protective information and developing rewarding relationships to keep them from danger. Yet the openness of information has limits. Competitive relationships, which also tie members to the group, depend on privately held knowledge. As a result, even in cohesive groups committed to mutual support, information is a valued resource. Each member is expected to develop secrets and to shelter them from others in most circumstances. Trust and secrecy are compatible in those voluntary organizations in which all members can gain access to private knowledge while placing their trust in colleagues to share protective information.
AB - The development and effects of group cohesion have been a long-standing concern in the small-group literature. Through an ethnographic examination of a leisure activity involving risk-mushroom collecting-we analyze how voluntary leisure groups maintain members' allegiance and affiliation, and thus create cohesion. Trust (communal concern) and secrecy (individual self-interest), based originally on information and subsequently on relationships, are critical to group stability. Groups provide arenas in which new members can place their trust in "experts," thus receiving protective information and developing rewarding relationships to keep them from danger. Yet the openness of information has limits. Competitive relationships, which also tie members to the group, depend on privately held knowledge. As a result, even in cohesive groups committed to mutual support, information is a valued resource. Each member is expected to develop secrets and to shelter them from others in most circumstances. Trust and secrecy are compatible in those voluntary organizations in which all members can gain access to private knowledge while placing their trust in colleagues to share protective information.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030555635&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0030555635&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2307/2787117
DO - 10.2307/2787117
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0030555635
SN - 0190-2725
VL - 59
SP - 22
EP - 38
JO - Social Psychology Quarterly
JF - Social Psychology Quarterly
IS - 1
ER -