Securitization without adverse selection: The case of CLOs

Efraim Benmelech, Jennifer Dlugosz, Victoria Ivashina

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate whether securitization was associated with risky lending in the corporate loan market by examining the performance of individual loans held by collateralized loan obligations. We employ two different data sets that identify loan holdings for a large set of CLOs and find that adverse selection problems in corporate loan securitizations are less severe than commonly believed. Using a battery of performance tests, we find that loans securitized before 2005 performed no worse than comparable unsecuritized loans originated by the same bank. Even loans originated by the bank that acts as the CLO underwriter do not show under-performance relative to the rest of the CLO portfolio. While some evidence exists of under-performance for securitized loans originated between 2005 and 2007, it is not consistent across samples, performance measures, and horizons. Overall, we argue that the securitization of corporate loans is fundamentally different from securitization of other assets classes because securitized loans are fractions of syndicated loans. Therefore, mechanisms used to align incentives in a lending syndicate are likely to reduce adverse selection in the choice of CLO collateral.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)91-113
Number of pages23
JournalJournal of Financial Economics
Volume106
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2012

Fingerprint

Adverse selection
Loans
Securitization
Underperformance
Lending
Syndicated loans
Obligation
Underwriters
Performance measures
Incentives
Syndicates
Assets

Keywords

  • CDOs
  • Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)
  • Structured finance
  • Syndicated loans

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Accounting
  • Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Strategy and Management

Cite this

Benmelech, Efraim ; Dlugosz, Jennifer ; Ivashina, Victoria. / Securitization without adverse selection : The case of CLOs. In: Journal of Financial Economics. 2012 ; Vol. 106, No. 1. pp. 91-113.
@article{92c0aeaac3904a50a3b4b65aa1de8da8,
title = "Securitization without adverse selection: The case of CLOs",
abstract = "In this paper, we investigate whether securitization was associated with risky lending in the corporate loan market by examining the performance of individual loans held by collateralized loan obligations. We employ two different data sets that identify loan holdings for a large set of CLOs and find that adverse selection problems in corporate loan securitizations are less severe than commonly believed. Using a battery of performance tests, we find that loans securitized before 2005 performed no worse than comparable unsecuritized loans originated by the same bank. Even loans originated by the bank that acts as the CLO underwriter do not show under-performance relative to the rest of the CLO portfolio. While some evidence exists of under-performance for securitized loans originated between 2005 and 2007, it is not consistent across samples, performance measures, and horizons. Overall, we argue that the securitization of corporate loans is fundamentally different from securitization of other assets classes because securitized loans are fractions of syndicated loans. Therefore, mechanisms used to align incentives in a lending syndicate are likely to reduce adverse selection in the choice of CLO collateral.",
keywords = "CDOs, Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), Structured finance, Syndicated loans",
author = "Efraim Benmelech and Jennifer Dlugosz and Victoria Ivashina",
year = "2012",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.006",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "106",
pages = "91--113",
journal = "Journal of Financial Economics",
issn = "0304-405X",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1",

}

Securitization without adverse selection : The case of CLOs. / Benmelech, Efraim; Dlugosz, Jennifer; Ivashina, Victoria.

In: Journal of Financial Economics, Vol. 106, No. 1, 01.10.2012, p. 91-113.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Securitization without adverse selection

T2 - The case of CLOs

AU - Benmelech, Efraim

AU - Dlugosz, Jennifer

AU - Ivashina, Victoria

PY - 2012/10/1

Y1 - 2012/10/1

N2 - In this paper, we investigate whether securitization was associated with risky lending in the corporate loan market by examining the performance of individual loans held by collateralized loan obligations. We employ two different data sets that identify loan holdings for a large set of CLOs and find that adverse selection problems in corporate loan securitizations are less severe than commonly believed. Using a battery of performance tests, we find that loans securitized before 2005 performed no worse than comparable unsecuritized loans originated by the same bank. Even loans originated by the bank that acts as the CLO underwriter do not show under-performance relative to the rest of the CLO portfolio. While some evidence exists of under-performance for securitized loans originated between 2005 and 2007, it is not consistent across samples, performance measures, and horizons. Overall, we argue that the securitization of corporate loans is fundamentally different from securitization of other assets classes because securitized loans are fractions of syndicated loans. Therefore, mechanisms used to align incentives in a lending syndicate are likely to reduce adverse selection in the choice of CLO collateral.

AB - In this paper, we investigate whether securitization was associated with risky lending in the corporate loan market by examining the performance of individual loans held by collateralized loan obligations. We employ two different data sets that identify loan holdings for a large set of CLOs and find that adverse selection problems in corporate loan securitizations are less severe than commonly believed. Using a battery of performance tests, we find that loans securitized before 2005 performed no worse than comparable unsecuritized loans originated by the same bank. Even loans originated by the bank that acts as the CLO underwriter do not show under-performance relative to the rest of the CLO portfolio. While some evidence exists of under-performance for securitized loans originated between 2005 and 2007, it is not consistent across samples, performance measures, and horizons. Overall, we argue that the securitization of corporate loans is fundamentally different from securitization of other assets classes because securitized loans are fractions of syndicated loans. Therefore, mechanisms used to align incentives in a lending syndicate are likely to reduce adverse selection in the choice of CLO collateral.

KW - CDOs

KW - Collateralized loan obligations (CLOs)

KW - Structured finance

KW - Syndicated loans

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84865037345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84865037345&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.006

DO - 10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.006

M3 - Article

VL - 106

SP - 91

EP - 113

JO - Journal of Financial Economics

JF - Journal of Financial Economics

SN - 0304-405X

IS - 1

ER -