TY - JOUR
T1 - Seiberg duality and [formula presented] experiments
AU - de Gouvêa, André
AU - Friedland, Alexander
PY - 1999/4/13
Y1 - 1999/4/13
N2 - Seiberg duality in supersymmetric gauge theories is the claim that two different theories describe the same physics in the infrared limit. However, one cannot easily work out physical quantities in strongly coupled theories and hence it has been difficult to compare the physics of the electric and magnetic theories. In order to gain more insight into the equivalence of two theories, we study the “(Formula presented)” cross sections into “hadrons” for both theories in the superconformal window. We describe a technique which allows us to compute the cross sections exactly in the infrared limit. They are indeed equal in the low-energy limit and the equality is guaranteed because of the anomaly matching condition. The ultraviolet behavior of the total “(Formula presented)” cross section is different for the two theories. We comment on proposed non-supersymmetric dualities. We also analyze the agreement of the “(Formula presented)” and “(Formula presented)” scattering amplitudes in both theories, and in particular try to understand if their equivalence can be explained by the anomaly matching condition.
AB - Seiberg duality in supersymmetric gauge theories is the claim that two different theories describe the same physics in the infrared limit. However, one cannot easily work out physical quantities in strongly coupled theories and hence it has been difficult to compare the physics of the electric and magnetic theories. In order to gain more insight into the equivalence of two theories, we study the “(Formula presented)” cross sections into “hadrons” for both theories in the superconformal window. We describe a technique which allows us to compute the cross sections exactly in the infrared limit. They are indeed equal in the low-energy limit and the equality is guaranteed because of the anomaly matching condition. The ultraviolet behavior of the total “(Formula presented)” cross section is different for the two theories. We comment on proposed non-supersymmetric dualities. We also analyze the agreement of the “(Formula presented)” and “(Formula presented)” scattering amplitudes in both theories, and in particular try to understand if their equivalence can be explained by the anomaly matching condition.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85037888624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85037888624&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.105008
DO - 10.1103/PhysRevD.59.105008
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85037888624
SN - 1550-7998
VL - 59
JO - Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology
JF - Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology
IS - 10
ER -