Selection criteria for residency

Results of a national program directors survey

Marianne Green*, Paul Jones, John X Thomas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

130 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the relative importance of criteria used for residency selection in 21 medical specialties given current available data and competitiveness of specialties. METHOD: In 2006, questionnaires were distributed to 2,528 program directors in university hospital or university-affiliated community hospital residency programs across 21 medical specialties. Responses were recorded using a five-point Likert scale of importance. Mean values for each item were calculated within and across all specialties. Mean scores for item responses were used to create rank orders of selection criteria within the specialties. To facilitate comparisons, specialties were grouped according to the percentages of positions filled with U.S. medical school graduates. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 49%. With the data from all specialties pooled, the top five selection criteria were (1) grades in required clerkships, (2) United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score, (3) grades in senior electives in specialty, (4) number of honors grades, and (5) USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score. CONCLUSIONS: The top academic selection criteria are based on clinical performance, with the exception of USMLE Step 1 score. Indicators that reflect excellence in clinical performance are valued across the specialties by residency program directors regardless of competitiveness within the specialty. USMLE Step 2 CK ranks higher in the less competitive specialties, whereas research experience is more prominent in the most competitive specialties. The Medical Student Performance Evaluation was ranked lowest of all criteria by the program directors.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)362-367
Number of pages6
JournalAcademic Medicine
Volume84
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2009

Fingerprint

Licensure
Internship and Residency
Patient Selection
director
examination
Medicine
competitiveness
Community Hospital
performance
Medical Schools
Medical Students
university
school graduate
honor
medical student
Surveys and Questionnaires
Research
questionnaire
evaluation
knowledge

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)
  • Education

Cite this

@article{d72fc99563a4449c9c30827460a12a13,
title = "Selection criteria for residency: Results of a national program directors survey",
abstract = "PURPOSE: To assess the relative importance of criteria used for residency selection in 21 medical specialties given current available data and competitiveness of specialties. METHOD: In 2006, questionnaires were distributed to 2,528 program directors in university hospital or university-affiliated community hospital residency programs across 21 medical specialties. Responses were recorded using a five-point Likert scale of importance. Mean values for each item were calculated within and across all specialties. Mean scores for item responses were used to create rank orders of selection criteria within the specialties. To facilitate comparisons, specialties were grouped according to the percentages of positions filled with U.S. medical school graduates. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 49{\%}. With the data from all specialties pooled, the top five selection criteria were (1) grades in required clerkships, (2) United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score, (3) grades in senior electives in specialty, (4) number of honors grades, and (5) USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score. CONCLUSIONS: The top academic selection criteria are based on clinical performance, with the exception of USMLE Step 1 score. Indicators that reflect excellence in clinical performance are valued across the specialties by residency program directors regardless of competitiveness within the specialty. USMLE Step 2 CK ranks higher in the less competitive specialties, whereas research experience is more prominent in the most competitive specialties. The Medical Student Performance Evaluation was ranked lowest of all criteria by the program directors.",
author = "Marianne Green and Paul Jones and Thomas, {John X}",
year = "2009",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181970c6b",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "84",
pages = "362--367",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins",
number = "3",

}

Selection criteria for residency : Results of a national program directors survey. / Green, Marianne; Jones, Paul; Thomas, John X.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 84, No. 3, 01.01.2009, p. 362-367.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selection criteria for residency

T2 - Results of a national program directors survey

AU - Green, Marianne

AU - Jones, Paul

AU - Thomas, John X

PY - 2009/1/1

Y1 - 2009/1/1

N2 - PURPOSE: To assess the relative importance of criteria used for residency selection in 21 medical specialties given current available data and competitiveness of specialties. METHOD: In 2006, questionnaires were distributed to 2,528 program directors in university hospital or university-affiliated community hospital residency programs across 21 medical specialties. Responses were recorded using a five-point Likert scale of importance. Mean values for each item were calculated within and across all specialties. Mean scores for item responses were used to create rank orders of selection criteria within the specialties. To facilitate comparisons, specialties were grouped according to the percentages of positions filled with U.S. medical school graduates. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 49%. With the data from all specialties pooled, the top five selection criteria were (1) grades in required clerkships, (2) United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score, (3) grades in senior electives in specialty, (4) number of honors grades, and (5) USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score. CONCLUSIONS: The top academic selection criteria are based on clinical performance, with the exception of USMLE Step 1 score. Indicators that reflect excellence in clinical performance are valued across the specialties by residency program directors regardless of competitiveness within the specialty. USMLE Step 2 CK ranks higher in the less competitive specialties, whereas research experience is more prominent in the most competitive specialties. The Medical Student Performance Evaluation was ranked lowest of all criteria by the program directors.

AB - PURPOSE: To assess the relative importance of criteria used for residency selection in 21 medical specialties given current available data and competitiveness of specialties. METHOD: In 2006, questionnaires were distributed to 2,528 program directors in university hospital or university-affiliated community hospital residency programs across 21 medical specialties. Responses were recorded using a five-point Likert scale of importance. Mean values for each item were calculated within and across all specialties. Mean scores for item responses were used to create rank orders of selection criteria within the specialties. To facilitate comparisons, specialties were grouped according to the percentages of positions filled with U.S. medical school graduates. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 49%. With the data from all specialties pooled, the top five selection criteria were (1) grades in required clerkships, (2) United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 score, (3) grades in senior electives in specialty, (4) number of honors grades, and (5) USMLE Step 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) score. CONCLUSIONS: The top academic selection criteria are based on clinical performance, with the exception of USMLE Step 1 score. Indicators that reflect excellence in clinical performance are valued across the specialties by residency program directors regardless of competitiveness within the specialty. USMLE Step 2 CK ranks higher in the less competitive specialties, whereas research experience is more prominent in the most competitive specialties. The Medical Student Performance Evaluation was ranked lowest of all criteria by the program directors.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=63249086608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=63249086608&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181970c6b

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181970c6b

M3 - Article

VL - 84

SP - 362

EP - 367

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 3

ER -