Selection of subspecialty fellows in anesthesia for pediatric anesthesia

A national survey of program directors in the United States

Hubert A. Benzon, Gildasio S. De Oliveira*, Narasimhan Jagannathan, Santhanam Suresh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background Several studies have investigated the selection process for medical students, residents, and fellows across different specialties. Currently, the selection criteria used by pediatric anesthesia program directors to select prospective pediatric anesthesia fellows are unknown. Objective To evaluate the criteria used by program directors in the selection of prospective pediatric anesthesia fellows in the United States. Methods Survey responses were solicited from 51 pediatric anesthesia fellowship directors in the United States. Questions evaluated department demographic information, the importance of fellowship selection criteria, and program satisfaction with the Match process. Results Forty-two of 51 fellowship directors responded to the survey (a response rate of 82%). The personal statement was reported as extremely/very important for 30 of 42 (71%) program directors, while research experience and prior publications were reported as extremely/very important for 16 of 41 (39%) and 16 of 41 (39%) program directors, respectively. Programs that offered all the spots through the Match were smaller, median (IQR) number of fellows of 3 (2-6) compared to the ones that did not offer all the spots through the Match, 8 (2-12), P = 0.03. In contrast, no difference in program directors' satisfaction with the Match was detected between smaller (≤3 fellows) and larger programs (>3 fellows), P = 0.25. Conclusion A minority of pediatric fellowship program directors rated prior research experience as an important factor in the selection of prospective fellows. The lack of emphasis on research qualities for fellows is potentially concerning for the future of our specialty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)487-491
Number of pages5
JournalPaediatric Anaesthesia
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2015

Fingerprint

Anesthesia
Pediatrics
Patient Selection
Research
Medical Students
Publications
Demography
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • anesthesia
  • fellowship
  • pediatrics
  • selection

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Cite this

@article{e26351e8c807449c88eb417f79c40a46,
title = "Selection of subspecialty fellows in anesthesia for pediatric anesthesia: A national survey of program directors in the United States",
abstract = "Background Several studies have investigated the selection process for medical students, residents, and fellows across different specialties. Currently, the selection criteria used by pediatric anesthesia program directors to select prospective pediatric anesthesia fellows are unknown. Objective To evaluate the criteria used by program directors in the selection of prospective pediatric anesthesia fellows in the United States. Methods Survey responses were solicited from 51 pediatric anesthesia fellowship directors in the United States. Questions evaluated department demographic information, the importance of fellowship selection criteria, and program satisfaction with the Match process. Results Forty-two of 51 fellowship directors responded to the survey (a response rate of 82{\%}). The personal statement was reported as extremely/very important for 30 of 42 (71{\%}) program directors, while research experience and prior publications were reported as extremely/very important for 16 of 41 (39{\%}) and 16 of 41 (39{\%}) program directors, respectively. Programs that offered all the spots through the Match were smaller, median (IQR) number of fellows of 3 (2-6) compared to the ones that did not offer all the spots through the Match, 8 (2-12), P = 0.03. In contrast, no difference in program directors' satisfaction with the Match was detected between smaller (≤3 fellows) and larger programs (>3 fellows), P = 0.25. Conclusion A minority of pediatric fellowship program directors rated prior research experience as an important factor in the selection of prospective fellows. The lack of emphasis on research qualities for fellows is potentially concerning for the future of our specialty.",
keywords = "anesthesia, fellowship, pediatrics, selection",
author = "Benzon, {Hubert A.} and {De Oliveira}, {Gildasio S.} and Narasimhan Jagannathan and Santhanam Suresh",
year = "2015",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/pan.12608",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "25",
pages = "487--491",
journal = "Paediatric Anaesthesia",
issn = "1155-5645",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Selection of subspecialty fellows in anesthesia for pediatric anesthesia

T2 - A national survey of program directors in the United States

AU - Benzon, Hubert A.

AU - De Oliveira, Gildasio S.

AU - Jagannathan, Narasimhan

AU - Suresh, Santhanam

PY - 2015/5/1

Y1 - 2015/5/1

N2 - Background Several studies have investigated the selection process for medical students, residents, and fellows across different specialties. Currently, the selection criteria used by pediatric anesthesia program directors to select prospective pediatric anesthesia fellows are unknown. Objective To evaluate the criteria used by program directors in the selection of prospective pediatric anesthesia fellows in the United States. Methods Survey responses were solicited from 51 pediatric anesthesia fellowship directors in the United States. Questions evaluated department demographic information, the importance of fellowship selection criteria, and program satisfaction with the Match process. Results Forty-two of 51 fellowship directors responded to the survey (a response rate of 82%). The personal statement was reported as extremely/very important for 30 of 42 (71%) program directors, while research experience and prior publications were reported as extremely/very important for 16 of 41 (39%) and 16 of 41 (39%) program directors, respectively. Programs that offered all the spots through the Match were smaller, median (IQR) number of fellows of 3 (2-6) compared to the ones that did not offer all the spots through the Match, 8 (2-12), P = 0.03. In contrast, no difference in program directors' satisfaction with the Match was detected between smaller (≤3 fellows) and larger programs (>3 fellows), P = 0.25. Conclusion A minority of pediatric fellowship program directors rated prior research experience as an important factor in the selection of prospective fellows. The lack of emphasis on research qualities for fellows is potentially concerning for the future of our specialty.

AB - Background Several studies have investigated the selection process for medical students, residents, and fellows across different specialties. Currently, the selection criteria used by pediatric anesthesia program directors to select prospective pediatric anesthesia fellows are unknown. Objective To evaluate the criteria used by program directors in the selection of prospective pediatric anesthesia fellows in the United States. Methods Survey responses were solicited from 51 pediatric anesthesia fellowship directors in the United States. Questions evaluated department demographic information, the importance of fellowship selection criteria, and program satisfaction with the Match process. Results Forty-two of 51 fellowship directors responded to the survey (a response rate of 82%). The personal statement was reported as extremely/very important for 30 of 42 (71%) program directors, while research experience and prior publications were reported as extremely/very important for 16 of 41 (39%) and 16 of 41 (39%) program directors, respectively. Programs that offered all the spots through the Match were smaller, median (IQR) number of fellows of 3 (2-6) compared to the ones that did not offer all the spots through the Match, 8 (2-12), P = 0.03. In contrast, no difference in program directors' satisfaction with the Match was detected between smaller (≤3 fellows) and larger programs (>3 fellows), P = 0.25. Conclusion A minority of pediatric fellowship program directors rated prior research experience as an important factor in the selection of prospective fellows. The lack of emphasis on research qualities for fellows is potentially concerning for the future of our specialty.

KW - anesthesia

KW - fellowship

KW - pediatrics

KW - selection

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926521113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84926521113&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/pan.12608

DO - 10.1111/pan.12608

M3 - Review article

VL - 25

SP - 487

EP - 491

JO - Paediatric Anaesthesia

JF - Paediatric Anaesthesia

SN - 1155-5645

IS - 5

ER -