Self-management counseling in patients with heart failure: The heart failure adherence and retention randomized behavioral trial

Lynda H. Powell, James E. Calvin, Dejuran Richardson, Imke Janssen, Carlos F. Mendes De Leon, Kristin J. Flynn, Kathleen L Grady, Cheryl S. Rucker-Whitaker, Claudia Eaton, Elizabeth Avery

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

124 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Context: Motivating patients with heart failure to adhere to medical advice has not translated into clinical benefit, but past trials have had methodological limitations. Objective: To determine the value of self-management counseling plus heart failure education, compared with heart failure education alone, for the primary end point of death or heart failure hospitalization. Design, Setting, and Patients: The Heart Failure Adherence and Retention Trial (HART), a single-center, multiple-hospital, partially blinded behavioral efficacy randomized controlled trial involving 902 patients with mild to moderate heart failure and reduced or preserved systolic function, randomized from the Chicago metropolitan area between October 2001 and October 2004 and undergoing follow-up for 2 to 3 subsequent years. Interventions: All patients were offered 18 contacts and 18 heart failure educational tip sheets during the course of 1 year. Patients randomized to the education group received tip sheets in the mail and telephone calls to check comprehension. Patients randomized to the self-management group received tip sheets in groups and were taught self-management skills to implement the advice. Main Outcome Measure: Death or heart failure hospitalization during a median of 2.56 years of follow-up. Results: Patients were representative of typical clinical populations (mean age, 63.6 years; 47% women, 40% racial/ethnic minority, 52% with annual family income less than $30 000, and 23% with preserved systolic function). The rate of the primary end point in the self-management group was no different from that in the education group (163 [40.1%)] vs 171 [41.2%], respectively; odds ratio, 0.95 [95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.26]). There were no significant differences on any secondary end points, including death, heart failure hospitalization, all-cause hospitalization, or quality of life. Conclusions: Compared with an enhanced educational intervention alone, the addition of self-management counseling did not reduce death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00018005.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1331-1338
Number of pages8
JournalJAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Volume304
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 22 2010

Fingerprint

Self Care
Counseling
Heart Failure
Hospitalization
Education
Patient Advocacy
Postal Service
Telephone
Randomized Controlled Trials
Odds Ratio
Quality of Life
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Confidence Intervals

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

Powell, Lynda H. ; Calvin, James E. ; Richardson, Dejuran ; Janssen, Imke ; Mendes De Leon, Carlos F. ; Flynn, Kristin J. ; Grady, Kathleen L ; Rucker-Whitaker, Cheryl S. ; Eaton, Claudia ; Avery, Elizabeth. / Self-management counseling in patients with heart failure : The heart failure adherence and retention randomized behavioral trial. In: JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association. 2010 ; Vol. 304, No. 12. pp. 1331-1338.
@article{5ff65073ba4347f4a687ee2a86290363,
title = "Self-management counseling in patients with heart failure: The heart failure adherence and retention randomized behavioral trial",
abstract = "Context: Motivating patients with heart failure to adhere to medical advice has not translated into clinical benefit, but past trials have had methodological limitations. Objective: To determine the value of self-management counseling plus heart failure education, compared with heart failure education alone, for the primary end point of death or heart failure hospitalization. Design, Setting, and Patients: The Heart Failure Adherence and Retention Trial (HART), a single-center, multiple-hospital, partially blinded behavioral efficacy randomized controlled trial involving 902 patients with mild to moderate heart failure and reduced or preserved systolic function, randomized from the Chicago metropolitan area between October 2001 and October 2004 and undergoing follow-up for 2 to 3 subsequent years. Interventions: All patients were offered 18 contacts and 18 heart failure educational tip sheets during the course of 1 year. Patients randomized to the education group received tip sheets in the mail and telephone calls to check comprehension. Patients randomized to the self-management group received tip sheets in groups and were taught self-management skills to implement the advice. Main Outcome Measure: Death or heart failure hospitalization during a median of 2.56 years of follow-up. Results: Patients were representative of typical clinical populations (mean age, 63.6 years; 47{\%} women, 40{\%} racial/ethnic minority, 52{\%} with annual family income less than $30 000, and 23{\%} with preserved systolic function). The rate of the primary end point in the self-management group was no different from that in the education group (163 [40.1{\%})] vs 171 [41.2{\%}], respectively; odds ratio, 0.95 [95{\%} confidence interval, 0.72-1.26]). There were no significant differences on any secondary end points, including death, heart failure hospitalization, all-cause hospitalization, or quality of life. Conclusions: Compared with an enhanced educational intervention alone, the addition of self-management counseling did not reduce death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00018005.",
author = "Powell, {Lynda H.} and Calvin, {James E.} and Dejuran Richardson and Imke Janssen and {Mendes De Leon}, {Carlos F.} and Flynn, {Kristin J.} and Grady, {Kathleen L} and Rucker-Whitaker, {Cheryl S.} and Claudia Eaton and Elizabeth Avery",
year = "2010",
month = "9",
day = "22",
doi = "10.1001/jama.2010.1362",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "304",
pages = "1331--1338",
journal = "JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association",
issn = "0098-7484",
publisher = "American Medical Association",
number = "12",

}

Powell, LH, Calvin, JE, Richardson, D, Janssen, I, Mendes De Leon, CF, Flynn, KJ, Grady, KL, Rucker-Whitaker, CS, Eaton, C & Avery, E 2010, 'Self-management counseling in patients with heart failure: The heart failure adherence and retention randomized behavioral trial', JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, vol. 304, no. 12, pp. 1331-1338. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.1362

Self-management counseling in patients with heart failure : The heart failure adherence and retention randomized behavioral trial. / Powell, Lynda H.; Calvin, James E.; Richardson, Dejuran; Janssen, Imke; Mendes De Leon, Carlos F.; Flynn, Kristin J.; Grady, Kathleen L; Rucker-Whitaker, Cheryl S.; Eaton, Claudia; Avery, Elizabeth.

In: JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 304, No. 12, 22.09.2010, p. 1331-1338.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Self-management counseling in patients with heart failure

T2 - The heart failure adherence and retention randomized behavioral trial

AU - Powell, Lynda H.

AU - Calvin, James E.

AU - Richardson, Dejuran

AU - Janssen, Imke

AU - Mendes De Leon, Carlos F.

AU - Flynn, Kristin J.

AU - Grady, Kathleen L

AU - Rucker-Whitaker, Cheryl S.

AU - Eaton, Claudia

AU - Avery, Elizabeth

PY - 2010/9/22

Y1 - 2010/9/22

N2 - Context: Motivating patients with heart failure to adhere to medical advice has not translated into clinical benefit, but past trials have had methodological limitations. Objective: To determine the value of self-management counseling plus heart failure education, compared with heart failure education alone, for the primary end point of death or heart failure hospitalization. Design, Setting, and Patients: The Heart Failure Adherence and Retention Trial (HART), a single-center, multiple-hospital, partially blinded behavioral efficacy randomized controlled trial involving 902 patients with mild to moderate heart failure and reduced or preserved systolic function, randomized from the Chicago metropolitan area between October 2001 and October 2004 and undergoing follow-up for 2 to 3 subsequent years. Interventions: All patients were offered 18 contacts and 18 heart failure educational tip sheets during the course of 1 year. Patients randomized to the education group received tip sheets in the mail and telephone calls to check comprehension. Patients randomized to the self-management group received tip sheets in groups and were taught self-management skills to implement the advice. Main Outcome Measure: Death or heart failure hospitalization during a median of 2.56 years of follow-up. Results: Patients were representative of typical clinical populations (mean age, 63.6 years; 47% women, 40% racial/ethnic minority, 52% with annual family income less than $30 000, and 23% with preserved systolic function). The rate of the primary end point in the self-management group was no different from that in the education group (163 [40.1%)] vs 171 [41.2%], respectively; odds ratio, 0.95 [95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.26]). There were no significant differences on any secondary end points, including death, heart failure hospitalization, all-cause hospitalization, or quality of life. Conclusions: Compared with an enhanced educational intervention alone, the addition of self-management counseling did not reduce death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00018005.

AB - Context: Motivating patients with heart failure to adhere to medical advice has not translated into clinical benefit, but past trials have had methodological limitations. Objective: To determine the value of self-management counseling plus heart failure education, compared with heart failure education alone, for the primary end point of death or heart failure hospitalization. Design, Setting, and Patients: The Heart Failure Adherence and Retention Trial (HART), a single-center, multiple-hospital, partially blinded behavioral efficacy randomized controlled trial involving 902 patients with mild to moderate heart failure and reduced or preserved systolic function, randomized from the Chicago metropolitan area between October 2001 and October 2004 and undergoing follow-up for 2 to 3 subsequent years. Interventions: All patients were offered 18 contacts and 18 heart failure educational tip sheets during the course of 1 year. Patients randomized to the education group received tip sheets in the mail and telephone calls to check comprehension. Patients randomized to the self-management group received tip sheets in groups and were taught self-management skills to implement the advice. Main Outcome Measure: Death or heart failure hospitalization during a median of 2.56 years of follow-up. Results: Patients were representative of typical clinical populations (mean age, 63.6 years; 47% women, 40% racial/ethnic minority, 52% with annual family income less than $30 000, and 23% with preserved systolic function). The rate of the primary end point in the self-management group was no different from that in the education group (163 [40.1%)] vs 171 [41.2%], respectively; odds ratio, 0.95 [95% confidence interval, 0.72-1.26]). There were no significant differences on any secondary end points, including death, heart failure hospitalization, all-cause hospitalization, or quality of life. Conclusions: Compared with an enhanced educational intervention alone, the addition of self-management counseling did not reduce death or heart failure hospitalization in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00018005.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77956894897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77956894897&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jama.2010.1362

DO - 10.1001/jama.2010.1362

M3 - Article

C2 - 20858878

AN - SCOPUS:77956894897

VL - 304

SP - 1331

EP - 1338

JO - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

JF - JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

SN - 0098-7484

IS - 12

ER -