TY - JOUR
T1 - Self-Organizing Into Winning Teams
T2 - Understanding the Mechanisms That Drive Successful Collaborations
AU - Wax, Amy
AU - DeChurch, Leslie A.
AU - Contractor, Noshir S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Note. Please see the “Results” section for additional details. aHypothesis was partially supported.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2017/12/1
Y1 - 2017/12/1
N2 - Contemporary teams are self-assembling with increasing frequency, meaning the component members are choosing to join forces with some degree of agency rather than being assigned to work with one another. However, the majority of the teams literature up until this point has focused on randomly assigned or staffed teams. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to investigate how people do form into teams and how people should form into teams. Specifically, we utilized a sample of digital traces from a massively multiplayer online role-playing game (N = 1,568) to evaluate the bases for and performance implications of team self-assembly. The results indicated that self-assembled teams form via three mechanisms: homophily, familiarity, and proximity. Moreover, results of the trace data analyses indicated that successful and unsuccessful teams were homogeneous in terms of different characteristics, and successful teams formed based on friendship more often than unsuccessful teams did.
AB - Contemporary teams are self-assembling with increasing frequency, meaning the component members are choosing to join forces with some degree of agency rather than being assigned to work with one another. However, the majority of the teams literature up until this point has focused on randomly assigned or staffed teams. Thus, the purpose of the current study was to investigate how people do form into teams and how people should form into teams. Specifically, we utilized a sample of digital traces from a massively multiplayer online role-playing game (N = 1,568) to evaluate the bases for and performance implications of team self-assembly. The results indicated that self-assembled teams form via three mechanisms: homophily, familiarity, and proximity. Moreover, results of the trace data analyses indicated that successful and unsuccessful teams were homogeneous in terms of different characteristics, and successful teams formed based on friendship more often than unsuccessful teams did.
KW - group formation/dissolution
KW - social networks
KW - team self-assembly
KW - work groups
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85033664844&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85033664844&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1046496417724209
DO - 10.1177/1046496417724209
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85033664844
SN - 1046-4964
VL - 48
SP - 665
EP - 718
JO - Small Group Research
JF - Small Group Research
IS - 6
ER -