Sensitive HLA antibody testing and the risk of antibody-mediated rejection and graft failure

Tim Debyser, Jasper Callemeyn, Maarten Coemans, Johan Kerkhofs, Priyanka Koshy, Dirk Kuypers, Aleksandar Senev, Anat R. Tambur, Elisabet Van Loon, Karolien Wellekens, Maarten Naesens*, Marie Paule Emonds

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Solid phase detection and identification of HLA antibodies in kidney transplantation currently relies on single antigen bead (Luminex®) assays, which is more sensitive than the previously used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). To evaluate the impact of more sensitive HLA testing on antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) occurrence and allograft survival, we analysed 1818 renal allograft recipients transplanted between March 2004 and May 2021. In 2008, solid phase testing switched from ELISA to Luminex. We included 393 (21.6%) transplantations before and 1425 (78.4%) transplantations after transition from ELISA- to Luminex-based testing. For this study, bio-banked ELISA era samples were tested retrospectively with Luminex. Significantly less pretransplant DSA were found in patients transplanted with pre-existing HLA antibodies in the Luminex (109/387) versus the ELISA period (43/90) (28% vs. 48%, p < 0.01). Throughout histological follow-up, 169 of 1818 (9.3%) patients developed AMR. After implementing Luminex-based testing, the rate of AMR significantly decreased (p = 0.003). However, incidence of graft failure did not significantly differ between both eras. In conclusion, less patients with pretransplant DSA were transplanted since the implementation of Luminex HLA testing. Transition from ELISA- to Luminex-based HLA testing was associated with a significant decrease in AMR occurrence post-transplantation. Since the decline of AMR did not translate into improved graft survival, Luminex-based testing has the added value of preventing low-risk AMR cases. Therefore, Luminex' high sensitivity must be balanced against waiting time for a suitable organ.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere15586
JournalHLA
Volume103
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2024

Funding

The authors gratefully express gratitude towards the centers of the Leuven Collaborative Group for Kidney Transplantation and all involved clinicians, nursing staff and patients. This work was supported by the Research Foundation \u2013 Flanders (FWO). KW, EVL and JC hold a FWO PhD fellowship grant. MC holds a FWO postdoctoral grant (). MN is supported by the FWO as a senior clinical investigator ( and ). 12D6423N 1844019N 1844024N The authors gratefully express gratitude towards the centers of the Leuven Collaborative Group for Kidney Transplantation and all involved clinicians, nursing staff and patients. This work was supported by the Research Foundation \u2013 Flanders (FWO). KW, EVL and JC hold a FWO PhD fellowship grant. MC holds a FWO postdoctoral grant (12D6423N). MN is supported by the FWO as a senior clinical investigator (1844019N and 1844024N).

Keywords

  • HLA antigens
  • graft rejection
  • histocompatibility testing
  • kidney transplantation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Immunology
  • Genetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Sensitive HLA antibody testing and the risk of antibody-mediated rejection and graft failure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this