TY - JOUR
T1 - Sensor Fusion of Vision, Kinetics, and Kinematics for Forward Prediction During Walking With a Transfemoral Prosthesis
AU - Krausz, Nili E.
AU - Hargrove, Levi J.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors would like to thank Annie Simon, Laura Miller, Suzanne Finucane, Joey Fisk, Blair Hu, and Brianna Wolin for assistance with data collection; past and current members of the Center for Bionic Medicine’s Mechatronics team for instrumentation help, particularly Jose Ochoa, Michael Stephens, Grant Wang, Kunal Shah and Matt Mungeon.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 IEEE. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/8/1
Y1 - 2021/8/1
N2 - Powered lower limb prostheses utilize activity specific controllers, where predicting desired activity and transitioning in a timely manner is essential for seamless locomotion without trips. Previously research considered EMG and mechanical sensors for these predictions; however, predictability must be improved to ensure safe usage. Previously we showed that combining features from mechanical sensors, EMG and Vision yielded greater repeatability, greater separability and lower variability. Here we compare performance of offline forward prediction systems combining these different sensor modalities. We trained and tested subject-specific classifiers for steady-state and transition steps, with data from 8 able-bodied subjects, 4 able-bodied subjects walking with a powered knee-ankle prosthesis using a bypass socket, and a single transfemoral amputee walking with a knee-ankle prosthesis. Fusing Mechanical, EMG, and Vision features produced the best classification for all subjects, with transition error rates in the range of 1% and steady-state error rates close to 0%. Though generalizability was good across able-bodied subjects, it was poor when training with able-bodied or bypass subjects and testing with our amputee subject, regardless of sensor modality, particularly for transition steps. Therefore, we believe a general classifier will require inclusion of amputee training data. Future work will test more subjects and continue development of a general control system.
AB - Powered lower limb prostheses utilize activity specific controllers, where predicting desired activity and transitioning in a timely manner is essential for seamless locomotion without trips. Previously research considered EMG and mechanical sensors for these predictions; however, predictability must be improved to ensure safe usage. Previously we showed that combining features from mechanical sensors, EMG and Vision yielded greater repeatability, greater separability and lower variability. Here we compare performance of offline forward prediction systems combining these different sensor modalities. We trained and tested subject-specific classifiers for steady-state and transition steps, with data from 8 able-bodied subjects, 4 able-bodied subjects walking with a powered knee-ankle prosthesis using a bypass socket, and a single transfemoral amputee walking with a knee-ankle prosthesis. Fusing Mechanical, EMG, and Vision features produced the best classification for all subjects, with transition error rates in the range of 1% and steady-state error rates close to 0%. Though generalizability was good across able-bodied subjects, it was poor when training with able-bodied or bypass subjects and testing with our amputee subject, regardless of sensor modality, particularly for transition steps. Therefore, we believe a general classifier will require inclusion of amputee training data. Future work will test more subjects and continue development of a general control system.
KW - Prosthetics
KW - computer vision
KW - human-robot interaction
KW - machine learning
KW - sensor fusion
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85111455100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85111455100&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/TMRB.2021.3082206
DO - 10.1109/TMRB.2021.3082206
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85111455100
SN - 2576-3202
VL - 3
SP - 813
EP - 824
JO - IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
JF - IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics
IS - 3
ER -