Sequential learning in individuals with agrammatic aphasia: evidence from artificial grammar learning

Julia Schuchard*, Cynthia K Thompson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We examined sequential learning in individuals with agrammatic aphasia (n = 12) and healthy age-matched participants (n = 12) using an artificial grammar. Artificial grammar acquisition, 24-hour retention, and the potential benefits of additional training were examined by administering an artificial grammar judgment test (1) immediately following auditory exposure-based training, (2) one day after training, and (3) after a second training session on the second day. An untrained control group (n = 12 healthy age-matched participants) completed the tests on the same time schedule. The trained healthy and aphasic groups showed greater sensitivity to the detection of grammatical items than the control group. No significant correlations between sequential learning and language abilities were observed among the aphasic participants. The results suggest that individuals with agrammatic aphasia show sequential learning, but the underlying processes involved in this learning may be different than for healthy adults.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)521-534
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Cognitive Psychology
Volume29
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 4 2017

Fingerprint

Aphasia
Learning
Control Groups
Aptitude
Appointments and Schedules
Language
Agrammatic Aphasia
Artificial Grammar Learning
Artificial Grammar
Aphasic
Control Group

Keywords

  • Agrammatic aphasia
  • artificial grammar
  • retention
  • sequential learning

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)

Cite this

@article{3f91f53f09b848eba5314f2996493a1d,
title = "Sequential learning in individuals with agrammatic aphasia: evidence from artificial grammar learning",
abstract = "We examined sequential learning in individuals with agrammatic aphasia (n = 12) and healthy age-matched participants (n = 12) using an artificial grammar. Artificial grammar acquisition, 24-hour retention, and the potential benefits of additional training were examined by administering an artificial grammar judgment test (1) immediately following auditory exposure-based training, (2) one day after training, and (3) after a second training session on the second day. An untrained control group (n = 12 healthy age-matched participants) completed the tests on the same time schedule. The trained healthy and aphasic groups showed greater sensitivity to the detection of grammatical items than the control group. No significant correlations between sequential learning and language abilities were observed among the aphasic participants. The results suggest that individuals with agrammatic aphasia show sequential learning, but the underlying processes involved in this learning may be different than for healthy adults.",
keywords = "Agrammatic aphasia, artificial grammar, retention, sequential learning",
author = "Julia Schuchard and Thompson, {Cynthia K}",
year = "2017",
month = "7",
day = "4",
doi = "10.1080/20445911.2017.1293065",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "29",
pages = "521--534",
journal = "Journal of Cognitive Psychology",
issn = "2044-5911",
publisher = "Psychology Press Ltd",
number = "5",

}

Sequential learning in individuals with agrammatic aphasia : evidence from artificial grammar learning. / Schuchard, Julia; Thompson, Cynthia K.

In: Journal of Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 29, No. 5, 04.07.2017, p. 521-534.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Sequential learning in individuals with agrammatic aphasia

T2 - evidence from artificial grammar learning

AU - Schuchard, Julia

AU - Thompson, Cynthia K

PY - 2017/7/4

Y1 - 2017/7/4

N2 - We examined sequential learning in individuals with agrammatic aphasia (n = 12) and healthy age-matched participants (n = 12) using an artificial grammar. Artificial grammar acquisition, 24-hour retention, and the potential benefits of additional training were examined by administering an artificial grammar judgment test (1) immediately following auditory exposure-based training, (2) one day after training, and (3) after a second training session on the second day. An untrained control group (n = 12 healthy age-matched participants) completed the tests on the same time schedule. The trained healthy and aphasic groups showed greater sensitivity to the detection of grammatical items than the control group. No significant correlations between sequential learning and language abilities were observed among the aphasic participants. The results suggest that individuals with agrammatic aphasia show sequential learning, but the underlying processes involved in this learning may be different than for healthy adults.

AB - We examined sequential learning in individuals with agrammatic aphasia (n = 12) and healthy age-matched participants (n = 12) using an artificial grammar. Artificial grammar acquisition, 24-hour retention, and the potential benefits of additional training were examined by administering an artificial grammar judgment test (1) immediately following auditory exposure-based training, (2) one day after training, and (3) after a second training session on the second day. An untrained control group (n = 12 healthy age-matched participants) completed the tests on the same time schedule. The trained healthy and aphasic groups showed greater sensitivity to the detection of grammatical items than the control group. No significant correlations between sequential learning and language abilities were observed among the aphasic participants. The results suggest that individuals with agrammatic aphasia show sequential learning, but the underlying processes involved in this learning may be different than for healthy adults.

KW - Agrammatic aphasia

KW - artificial grammar

KW - retention

KW - sequential learning

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85013130639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85013130639&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/20445911.2017.1293065

DO - 10.1080/20445911.2017.1293065

M3 - Article

C2 - 28690782

AN - SCOPUS:85013130639

VL - 29

SP - 521

EP - 534

JO - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

JF - Journal of Cognitive Psychology

SN - 2044-5911

IS - 5

ER -