Abstract
Argues that the choice of a network or set-theoretic representation correlates with 2 substantive differences among models of semantic memory. First, in explaining certain reaction time effects, networks models emphasize retrieval processes, while set-theoretic models often emphasize comparison processes. Second, set-theoretic models posit more semantic analysis during sentence verification than do network models. J. D. Hollan's (see PA, Vol 54:Issue 4) recent demonstration of an isomorphism between set-theoretic and network representations cannot resolve these important issues. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2006 APA, all rights reserved).
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 156-157 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Psychological Review |
Volume | 82 |
Issue number | 2 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Mar 1975 |
Keywords
- network vs set-theoretic model, semantic memory, reply to J. Hollan's criticism
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Psychology